ViaView, Inc. v. Chanson et al
Filing
28
DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff ViaView, Inc. and against Defendants Blue Mist Media, Amy L. Chanson, Eric S. Chanson, Kevin C. Bollaert, and Roy E. Chanson in the amount of 330,473.75. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 04/22/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
1 Marc J. Randazza, NV Bar # 12265
Ronald D. Green, NV Bar #7360
2 J. Malcolm DeVoy IV, NV Bar #11950
Randazza Legal Group
3 6525 W. Warm Springs Road, Suite 100
4 Las Vegas, NV 89118
888-667-1113
5 305-437-7662 fax
ecf@randazza.com
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7 VIAVIEW, INC.
8
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ERIC S. CHANSON; KEVIN C. BOLLAERT; )
CODY ALVIAR; ROY E. CHANSON; AMY L. )
CHANSON; and BLUE MIST MEDIA, LLC,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
9 VIAVIEW, INC.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Case No. 2:12-cv-01657-GMN-GWF
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
Plaintiff ViaView, Inc., having filed a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment against
Defendants Blue Mist Media, Eric S. Chanson, Kevin Bollaert, Roy E. Chanson, and Amy L.
Chanson pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; the Defendants having failed
to respond to, or answer, Plaintiff’s Complaint previously served upon Defendants; the Clerk of the
20 Court having entered Default against Defendants on March 5, 2013; this Court having now given
21 due consideration to Plaintiff’s Motion for such judgment as well as papers, pleadings, and exhibits
22 offered in support thereof; and the Court being further fully advised in the matter and there having
23 been no appearance made by Defendants, it is therefore,
24
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff
25 VIAVIEW, INC., and against Defendants Blue Mist Media, Eric S. Chanson, Kevin Bollaert, Roy
26 E. Chanson, and Amy L. Chanson, on all counts of Plaintiffs’ Complaint; and, it is further ordered
27 and adjudged that said Judgment shall include the following specific findings of fact and award of
28 specific relief:
1
1
2
a. Plaintiff VIaView is the owner of the ISANYONEUP trademark and variations thereof
used in relation to various services as identified in the Complaint;
3
b. Defendants registered, trafficked in, and used the Infringing Domain Names
4
, , and with the bad
5
faith intent to profit from their use of Plaintiff’s mark;
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
c. Defendants Blue Mist, Eric Chanson, and Kevin Bollaert used the Infringing Domain
Names to solicit and post naked pictures and videos of persons who were photographed
without their consent or permission;
d. Defendants used the Infringing Domain Names in a manner similar to Plaintiff’s
predecessor-in-interest;
e. Defendants’ use of the term ISANYONEUP in connection with its services is likely to
cause confusion as to the source and origin of Defendants’ services;
f. Defendants’ use of the term ISANYONEUP in connection with its services has and is
likely to continue to cause confusion with Plaintiff’s ISANYONEUP mark;
14
g. Should Defendants’ use of Plaintiff’s ISANYONEUP mark continue, Plaintiff will
15
continue to suffer irreparable injury to its good will and reputation and for which an
16
award of damages would be inadequate.
17
18
19
20
h. Defendants acted willfully in their infringement of Plaintiff’s ISANYONEUP
trademark.
i. Defendants entered into a valid contract with Plaintiff to discontinue use of Plaintiff’s
ISANYONEUP mark and later breached that contract;
21
j. Defendants Roy Chanson and Amy Chanson intentionally interfered with Plaintiff’s
22
contractual relations with Defendants Eric Chanson, Kevin Bollaert, Cody Alviar, and
23
Blue Mist, causing damages to Plaintiff;
24
25
26
27
k. Defendants, through their overt, concerted acts, caused damage to Plaintiff’s good will
and reputation through the infringing use of the ISANYONEUP mark;
l. Defendants are liable for their infringement, unfair competition, cybersquatting, breach
of contract, civil conspiracy, and intentional interference with contractual relations.
28
2
Default Judgment
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Blue Mist Media, Eric S.
1
2 Chanson, Kevin Bollaert, Roy E. Chanson, and Amy L. Chanson, their respective officers, agents,
3 servants, employees, and/or all persons acting in concert with them, are prohibited (1) from using
4 Plaintiff’s trademarks or confusingly similar variations thereof, alone or in combination with any
5 other letters, words, letter strings, phrases, or designs, in commerce or in connection with any
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
business or for any other purpose (including, but not limited to, on web sites and in domain names);
and (2) from registering, owning, leasing, selling or trafficking in any domain name containing
Plaintiff’s marks or confusingly similar variations thereof, alone or in combination with any other
letters, words, phrases, or designs;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the current registrar and registry of the ,
, and domain names shall immediately unlock
and
permanently
transfer
the
,
,
and
domain names to Plaintiff and in the case of the noncompliance that the
13 corresponding registry, Verisign, PIR, and Neulevel, shall be required under 15 U.S.C. §
14 1125(d)(2)(D)(i) to change the registrar of record for the domain names ,
15 , and to GoDaddy, which will subsequently
16 permanently transfer , , and
17 domain names to Plaintiff;
18
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants pay Plaintiff $1,000 in nominal damages for
19 corrective advertising;
20
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants pay Plaintiff statutory damages of $100,000
21 per domain name, for a total of $300,000;
22
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants pay Plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees and costs in the
23 amount of $29,473.75;
24
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ cash deposit of Three Hundred Dollars
25
($300.00) for the three domain names be released from the Registry Account of this Court and
26
27
returned to Randazza Legal Group.
//
28
3
Default Judgment
_____________________________
Gloria M. Navarro
United States District Judge
DATED: 04/22/2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?