Rodriguez-Malfavon v. Clark County School District et al

Filing 41

ORDER granting 40 Stipulation to extend time for Plaintiff to file an opposition to Defendant's 39 Motion for summary judgment. Responses due by 3/4/2015. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/2/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

Download PDF
Case 2:12-cv-01673-APG-PAL Document 40 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 RICHARD SEGERBLOM, ESQ., Bar # 1010 700 South Third Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: 702.388.9600 Fax No.: 702.385.2909 Attorney for Plaintiff ELENA RODRIGUEZ-MALFAVON 5 6 7 8 PATRICK H. HICKS, ESQ., Bar # 4632 ETHAN D. THOMAS, ESQ., Bar # 12874 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 Telephone: 702.862.8800 Fax No.: 702.862.8811 9 10 11 12 13 14 JAMIE CHU, ESQ., Bar # 10546 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 2050 Main Street, Suite 900 Irvine, CA 92614 Telephone: 949.705.3000 Fax No.: 949.724.1201 Attorneys for Defendants CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, EDWARD GOLDMAN and ANITA WILBUR 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 17 18 ELENA RODRIGUEZ-MALFAVON, CASE NO. 2:12-CV-01673-APG-PAL 19 Plaintiff, 20 vs. 21 22 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, EDWARD GOLDMAN and ANITA WILBUR, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [FIRST REQUEST] 23 Defendant. 24 25 In compliance with Local Rules 6-1 and 26-4, Defendants CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL 26 DISTRICT, EDWARD GOLDMAN and ANITA WILBUR (collectively referred to as 27 “Defendants”) and Plaintiff ELENA RODRIGUEZ-MALFAVON (“Plaintiff”), by and through 28 their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to file LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 702.862.8800 Case 2:12-cv-01673-APG-PAL Document 40 Filed 01/30/15 Page 2 of 2 1 an opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc #39) filed January 7, 2015 by 2 30-days. The current deadline to file the opposition is February 2, 2015.1 The new deadline for 3 Plaintiff’s opposition will be, up to and including, March 4, 2015. 4 This stipulation is submitted as an extension is necessary because Plaintiff’s counsel was 5 required to spend time out of the office in January 2015 due to a family member’s medical 6 emergency. Additionally, throughout the month of February 2015, Plaintiff’s counsel will spend a 7 significant amount of time serving in the Nevada legislature. The parties agree and represent to the 8 Court that this request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. 9 10 11 Dated: January 30, 2015 Dated: January 30, 2015 Respectfully submitted, Respectfully submitted, /s/ Richard Segerblom RICHARD SEGERBLOM, ESQ. /s/ Ethan D. Thomas PATRICK H. HICKS, ESQ. JAMIE CHU, ESQ. ETHAN D. THOMAS, ESQ. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 12 13 14 15 Attorney for Plaintiff ELENA RODRIGUEZ-MALFAVON Attorneys for Defendants CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, EDWARD GOLDMAN and ANITA WILBUR 16 17 18 ORDER 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 February 2 Dated: _____________________, 2015. 21 22 23 _______________________________________ ___________________________ ___ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU COURT JUDGE NITED 24 25 Firmwide:131455387.1 026133.1015 26 27 1 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 702.862.8800 The generated deadline for Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #39) is January 31, 2015. As January 31, 2015 falls on a non-business day, the deadline is Monday, February 2, 2015. 2.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?