Rodriguez-Malfavon v. Clark County School District et al
Filing
41
ORDER granting 40 Stipulation to extend time for Plaintiff to file an opposition to Defendant's 39 Motion for summary judgment. Responses due by 3/4/2015. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/2/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
Case 2:12-cv-01673-APG-PAL Document 40 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
RICHARD SEGERBLOM, ESQ., Bar # 1010
700 South Third Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: 702.388.9600
Fax No.:
702.385.2909
Attorney for Plaintiff
ELENA RODRIGUEZ-MALFAVON
5
6
7
8
PATRICK H. HICKS, ESQ., Bar # 4632
ETHAN D. THOMAS, ESQ., Bar # 12874
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
Telephone: 702.862.8800
Fax No.:
702.862.8811
9
10
11
12
13
14
JAMIE CHU, ESQ., Bar # 10546
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
2050 Main Street, Suite 900
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone:
949.705.3000
Fax No.:
949.724.1201
Attorneys for Defendants
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
EDWARD GOLDMAN and ANITA WILBUR
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
17
18
ELENA RODRIGUEZ-MALFAVON,
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-01673-APG-PAL
19
Plaintiff,
20
vs.
21
22
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
EDWARD GOLDMAN and ANITA
WILBUR,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[FIRST REQUEST]
23
Defendant.
24
25
In compliance with Local Rules 6-1 and 26-4, Defendants CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL
26
DISTRICT, EDWARD GOLDMAN and ANITA WILBUR (collectively referred to as
27
“Defendants”) and Plaintiff ELENA RODRIGUEZ-MALFAVON (“Plaintiff”), by and through
28
their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to file
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
702.862.8800
Case 2:12-cv-01673-APG-PAL Document 40 Filed 01/30/15 Page 2 of 2
1
an opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc #39) filed January 7, 2015 by
2
30-days. The current deadline to file the opposition is February 2, 2015.1 The new deadline for
3
Plaintiff’s opposition will be, up to and including, March 4, 2015.
4
This stipulation is submitted as an extension is necessary because Plaintiff’s counsel was
5
required to spend time out of the office in January 2015 due to a family member’s medical
6
emergency. Additionally, throughout the month of February 2015, Plaintiff’s counsel will spend a
7
significant amount of time serving in the Nevada legislature. The parties agree and represent to the
8
Court that this request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
9
10
11
Dated: January 30, 2015
Dated: January 30, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Richard Segerblom
RICHARD SEGERBLOM, ESQ.
/s/ Ethan D. Thomas
PATRICK H. HICKS, ESQ.
JAMIE CHU, ESQ.
ETHAN D. THOMAS, ESQ.
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
12
13
14
15
Attorney for Plaintiff
ELENA RODRIGUEZ-MALFAVON
Attorneys for Defendants
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
EDWARD GOLDMAN and ANITA WILBUR
16
17
18
ORDER
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
February 2
Dated: _____________________, 2015.
21
22
23
_______________________________________
___________________________
___
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU
COURT JUDGE
NITED
24
25
Firmwide:131455387.1 026133.1015
26
27
1
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
702.862.8800
The generated deadline for Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #39) is January
31, 2015. As January 31, 2015 falls on a non-business day, the deadline is Monday, February 2, 2015.
2.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?