Lo v. ETT Gaming et al

Filing 69

ORDER that Defendants shall treat Plaintiffs' filings 66 , 67 , and 68 as her more definite statement and may file any motion deemed appropriate in response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/12/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 YUNG LO, 8 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 9 10 Case No. 2:12-cv-01887-APG-PAL (Mot. Definite Doc. – Dkt. #66) (Response to OSC – Dkt. #67) (Mot. re: Truth of File – Dkt. #68) ETT GAMING, et al., Defendants. 11 12 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Yung Lo’s “Motion for Definite Document” 13 (Dkt. #66); “Motion Regarding Truth of File to Appeal Court” (Dkt. #68);1 and Response (Dkt. 14 #67) to the Court’s Order to Show Cause (Dkt. #65). Both Motions and the Response were filed 15 November 2, 2015. The response to the order to show cause provides some additional details 16 about her claims. Dkt #66 states limited appointed counsel, Mr. Kemp, did not tell her about the 17 stipulation and order requiring a more definite statement if the ENE did not settle the case. 18 The other motion also appears to be her attempts to provide additional details regarding 19 her claims against Defendants. The court is satisfied that sanctions are not warranted for her 20 failure to timely comply with the court’s prior order to provide a more definite statement. 21 The Court construes her filings (Dkt. ## 66, 67 & 68) as her attempt to show cause and 22 provide a more definite statement concerning her Complaint allegations and claims (Dkt. #5). 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 28 1 Neither of Ms. Lo’s “motions” contain requests for relief from the Court, therefore, they cannot be granted or denied. 1 1 2 3 IT IS ORDERED Defendants shall treat Plaintiff’s filings (Dkt #66, 67 & 68) as her more definite statement and may file any motion deemed appropriate in response. Dated this 12th day of November, 2015. 4 5 PEGGY A. LEEN PEGGY A. LEEN GY LEE Y UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?