Williams v. Kim et al
Filing
20
ORDER that the clerk shall electronically serve a copy of this order and the court's original 12 , 13 screening orders on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada, attention Kat Howe. Within 21 days of the date of entry of this order, the Attorney General's Office shall file a notice re acceptance of service. Plaintiff's 16 Motion for a Status Check is Denied as moot. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/2/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
1
2
3
4
ALBERT LEON WILLIAMS,
5
Plaintiff,
6
vs.
7
Case No. 2:12-cv-01900-GMN-VCF
SGT. KIM, et al.,
8
ORDER
Defendants.
9
10
This is an action on a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, removed from
11
state court (#1). The complaint was previously screened by the court (#12, #13). The matter shall
12
now proceed.
13
14
15
Petitioner has submitted a motion for a status check (#16). This order makes the motion
moot.
Petitioner also has submitted a letter (#18) stating that he did not have time to correct defects
16
in his allegations before the court entered an order (#17) dismissing defendants Baca and Cox.
17
Petitioner is incorrect. The court told plaintiff about the defects in his allegations involving
18
defendants Baca and Cox, and the court gave plaintiff the opportunity to correct those defects.
19
Order (#12). Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint in the allotted time, and the court
20
dismissed those defendants. Order (#13). The more recent order (#17) merely repeated what the
21
court already has done.
22
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
23
1.
The clerk shall electronically serve a copy of this order and the court’s original
24
screening orders (#12, #13) on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of
25
Nevada, attention Kat Howe.
26
2.
Subject to the findings of the screening orders (#12, #13), within twenty-one (21)
27
days of the date of entry of this order, the Attorney General’s Office shall file a
28
notice advising the court and plaintiff of: (a) the names of the defendants for whom it
1
accepts service; (b) the names of the defendants for whom it does not accept service,
2
and (c) the names of the defendants for whom it is filing last-known-address
3
information under seal. As to any of the named defendants for which the Attorney
4
General’s Office cannot accept service, the Office shall file, under seal, the last
5
known address(es) of those defendant(s) for whom it has such information.
6
3.
If service cannot be accepted for any of the named defendant(s), plaintiff shall file a
7
motion identifying the unserved defendant(s), requesting issuance of a summons, and
8
specifying a full name and address for the defendant(s). For the defendant(s) as to
9
which the Attorney General has not provided last-known-address information,
10
11
plaintiff shall provide the full name and address for the defendant(s).
4.
If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named defendant(s), such
12
defendant(s) shall file and serve an answer or other response to the complaint within
13
sixty (60) days from the date of this order.
14
5.
Henceforth, plaintiff shall serve upon defendant(s) or, if an appearance has been
15
entered by counsel, upon their attorney(s), a copy of every pleading, motion or other
16
document submitted for consideration by the court. Plaintiff shall include with the
17
original paper submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct
18
copy of the document was mailed to the defendants or counsel for the defendants. If
19
counsel has entered a notice of appearance, the plaintiff shall direct service to the
20
individual attorney named in the notice of appearance, at the address stated therein.
21
The court may disregard any paper received by a district judge or magistrate judge
22
which has not been filed with the Clerk, and any paper received by a district judge,
23
magistrate judge, or the Clerk which fails to include a certificate showing proper
24
service.
25
26
27
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a status check (#16) is DENIED
as moot.
DATED this 2nd day of December, 2013.
28
_________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?