Evanko Baars v. Astrue

Filing 27

ORDER that attorneys fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act in the amount of $5,832.38 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d); and $410 in costs under Taxation of Costs, 28 U.S.C. § 1920, are awarded subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation. Denying as moot 25 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/3/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 2 3 KATHLEEN P. EVANKO BAARS, 4 Plaintiff, 5 v. 6 CAROLYN W. COLVIN 1, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 7 Defendant. 8 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No: 2:12-cv-01914-GMN-CWH [PROPOSED] ORDER EQUAL ACCESS ORDER AWARDING AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 PURSUANT TO AND COSTS PURSUANT U.S.C. § 2412(d) 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 9 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for Award of Equal Access to Justice Act Attorney Fees 10 11 and Expenses Fees Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) and Costs Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920 12 (Stipulation), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act in 13 the amount of five thousand, eight hundred and thirty-two dollars and thirty-eight cents ($5,832.38) as 14 authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d); and four hundred and ten dollars in costs under Taxation of Costs, 15 28 U.S.C. § 1920, are awarded subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in light of the parties' Stipulation (ECF No. 26), Plaintiff's 16 17 Motion for EAJA Fees and Costs (ECF No. 25) is hereby DENIED as moot. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of December, 2013. IT IS SO ORDERED: 19 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Gloria M. Navarro United States District Judge 21 22 DATED: ___________________________ 23 24 1 Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14, 2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should be 25 substituted for Michael J. Astrue as the defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to 26 continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?