Brown v. Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER Denying 22 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to file a revised Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, including a statement of the reasons why longer or different time periods should apply to the case, no later than 1/30/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 01/23/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

HARRY RAY BROWN,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES NORTH
)
AMERICA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:12-cv-01947-MMD-GWF
ORDER

13

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling

14

Order (#22) filed January 18, 2013. The Defendant requests 365 days instead of 180 days due to

15

the many cases which are at more advanced stages of discovery and trial and the complexity of the

16

issues raised by this and other such cases. While Plaintiff does not necessarily agree, but does not

17

oppose the dates set forth in the discovery plan. The parties have not provided the Court with

18

enough information to support their request for a discovery period in excess of 180 days. The

19

Court needs more information why one year is necessary for discovery. Accordingly,

20
21
22

IT IS ORDERED the proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#22) is
denied, without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to file a revised Discovery Plan and

23

Scheduling Order in compliance with LR 26-1(d), including a statement of the reasons why longer

24

or different time periods should apply to the case, no later than January 30, 2013.

25

DATED this 23rd day of January, 2013.

26
27
28

______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge