Hypertherm, Inc. v. Profile Cutting Technologies Ltd. et al

Filing 23

DEFAULT JUDGMENT and Permanent Injunction in favor of Hypertherm, Inc. and against WestingCut Electric (Shanghai) Inc., WestingCut Industrial Technology (Anhui) Inc., and WestingCut Industrial Technology (Shanghai) Inc. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/13/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
Case 2:12-cv-01952-GMN-VCF Document 21 Filed 12/17/13 Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 8 HYPERTHERM, INC., Plaintiff, 9 10 vs. 11 PROFILE CUTTING TECHNOLOGIES LTD., et al., 2:12-cv-01952-GMN-VCF DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUCTION ORDER 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 This action having been commenced by Plaintiff Hypertherm, Inc. ("Hypertherm") against Defendants WestingCut Industrial Technology (Anhui) Inc., WestingCut Electric (Shanghai) Inc., and 16 WestingCut Industrial Technology (Shanghai) Inc. (collectively, the "Defendants") for patent 17 infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271 for the reason that Defendants are making, selling, offering to 18 sell, or using products infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 6,946,617; 8,115,136; 8,212,173; 7,829,816; and 19 6,207,923 (collectively, the "Hypertherm Asserted Patents"), which are owned and controlled by 20 Hypertherm; and 21 22 Defendants having been properly served through personal delivery ofthe Summons in a Civil Action, Civil Cover Sheet and Complaint upon an authorized agent of Defendants; and 23 None of the Defendants having filed a response to the Complaint or otherwise appeared in 24 this action; and 25 The Clerk of the Court having entered a default against each Defendant on May 16, 2013; Case 2:12-cv-01952-GMN-VCF Document 21 Filed 12/17/13 Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 and Hypertherm having moved for final default judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) and Hypertherm having shown, inter alia, the following: 1. Hypertherm owns all rights, title and interest in and to the Hypertherm Asserted Patents; and 2. Defendants are making, selling, offering to sell, or using products infringing the Hypertherm Asserted Patents in the United States, including this Judicial District; and so the Court: HEREBY FINDS that each Defendant is liable for patent infringement and this Default Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order is entered against each Defendant. 10 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants, their predecessors, 11 successors, assigns, executors, administrators, and its past, present and future officers, directors, 12 employees, parents, subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates, partners, attorneys, representatives, 13 14 15 16 shareholders, trustees, agents, advisors and any persons in active concert or participation with them are permanently enjoined and restrained from: (i) making, selling, offering to sell, or using non-genuine versions of original Hypertherm parts that are covered by the Hypertherm Asserted Patents; and (ii) selling or offering to sell such non-genuine versions of original Hypertherm parts that are covered by the Hypertherm Asserted Patents by any means, including at tradeshows and/or using online (internet) resources and services; or (iii) using the "Made in U.S.A." designation on labels for non-genuine parts that correspond to original Hypertherm parts that are covered by the Hypertherm Asserted Patents. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 25 2 Case 2:12-cv-01952-GMN-VCF Document 21 Filed 12/17/13 Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 § 285, Plaintiff is awarded reasonable attorney's fees, subject to plaintiff’s timely compliance with Fed.R.Civ. P. 54(d) and Local Rules 54-16. IT IS FINALL Y ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties and 4 the subject matter of this litigation for the purposes of interpretation and enforcement of this 5 Default Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 DATED this 13th day of January, 2014. DATED:_________________ 8 9 10 11 ________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge ________________________________ UNITED United States District Court STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?