Bailey et al v. Suey et al
ORDER Denying 11 Plaintiff's Motion of Possible Imminent Danger/Retaliation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/17/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
ANTHONY BAILEY, et al.,
CPT. RICH SUEY, et al.,
Case No. 2:12-cv-01954-JCM-CWH
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Anthony Bailey’s Motion of Possible Imminent
Danger/Retaliation (#11), filed November 30, 2012.
The Court has reviewed the motion and is unable to ascertain what specific relief or action
is sought. To the extent it can be considered a motion, it is denied for failure to failure to file
points and authorities in support of the motion. See Local Rule (“LR”) 7-2(d) (“The failure of a
moving party to file points and authorities in support of the motion shall constitute a consent to the
denial of the motion.”). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Anthony Bailey’s Motion of Possible Imminent
Danger/Retaliation (#11) is denied.
DATED this 17th day of December, 2012.
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?