DiFiore v. Astrue et al

Filing 20

ORDER Adopting and Accepting 14 Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1 Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 16 , 17 and 18 Motions are DENIED as Moot. Case terminated. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 07/10/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 MARGARETTE K. DiFIORE, an individual; Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 2:12-CV-02005-RCJ-CWH ORDER 11 12 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (#14) entered on May 21, 2013. Plaintiff 16 filed her Objections to Report and Recommendations and Motion for Enlargement of Time in Which 17 to Respond to “Order Reviewing Social Security Cases” (#15) on June 7, 2013. 18 The Court has conducted it’s de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of 19 the Plaintiffs, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant 20 to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The district court may accept, reject, or modify in 21 whole or in part, the findings and recommendations made by the magistrate judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). 22 The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#14) entered on May 23 21, 2013 is adopted and accepted. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (#1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motions (#16, 17 & 18) are DENIED as MOOT. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: This 10TH day of July, 2013. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _____________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT CHIEF JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?