American General Life Insurance Company v. Leovigildo Emanuel Elena-Martinez, et al
Filing
37
ORDER Granting 35 Motion to File Under Seal Exhibit A to 34 Stipulation for Deposit of Funds into Blocked Account and Discharge of Liability. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/2/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
Case 2:12-cv-02026-JAD-VCF Document 35 Filed 09/18/13 Page 1 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
V. ANDREW CASS
Nevada Bar No. 005246
PRISCILLA L. O’BRIANT
Nevada Bar No. 010171
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
702.893.3383
FAX: 702.893.3789
e-mail: cass@lbbslaw.com
Attorneys for American General Life
Insurance Company of Delaware formerly
known as AIG Life Insurance Company
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10 American General Life Insurance Company of
Delaware, formerly known as AIG Life
11 Insurance Company,
12
Plaintiff,
13 vs.
14 Leovigildo Emanuel Elena-Martinez, a minor;
Michael David Elena-Martinez, a minor;
15 Yesica and Rodrigo Higuera, individually and
as guardians of the minor children Leovigildo
16 Elena-Martinez and Michael Elena-Martinez;
Doe Individuals I-X; and ROE Corporations I17 X.
18
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-02026- LRH-VCF
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
EXHIBIT A TO STIPULATION FOR
DEPOSIT OF FUNDS INTO BLOCKED
ACCOUNT AND DISCHARGE OF
LIABILITY
Defendants.
19
20
Plaintiff American General Life Insurance Company of Delaware (AGLIC), by its attorneys
21 of record, LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH, respectfully petitions this Court for an
22 Order pursuant to LR-10-5(b) permitting the parties to file under seal Exhibit “A” to the Stipulation
23 for Deposit of Funds Into Blocked Account and Discharge Of Liability.
24
This Petition is based upon the pleadings and papers on file with this Court and the
25 following Memorandum of Points and Authorities.
26 / / /
27 / / /
LEWIS
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
28 / / /
4851-3937-3075.1
2:10-cv-01434-MMD-RJJ
Case 2:12-cv-02026-JAD-VCF Document 35 Filed 09/18/13 Page 2 of 5
1
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
2
I.
3
BACKGROUND
4
AGLIC issued a Group Accident Insurance policy to Marriott International, Inc., which
5 included accident death benefits for its employees. After the death of Juana Toledo, a Marriott
6 employee, Yesica Higuera asserted claims on behalf of Leovigildo Elena-Martinez and Michael
7 Elena-Martinez. As Juana Toledo was not married, any children are her beneficiaries under the
8 Policy. AGLIC requested copies of the birth certificates of Leovigildo Elena-Martinez and
9 Michael Elena-Martinez to establish that they were the children of Juana Toledo but these were not
10 provided. AGLIC also requested copy of the Guardianship of Property or the Letters of
11 Conservatorship for the Estate of Leovigildo and Michael - these documents were necessary before
12 AGLIC could pay the monies to Yesica Higuera as absent such documentation, AGLIC would be
13 exposed to double or multiple liability should Michael and/or Leovigildo submit claims upon
14 reaching the age of majority.
15
AGLIC has now received copies of the birth certificates of Leovigildo Elena-Martinez and
16 Michael Elena-Martinez, documenting that they are the children of Juana Toledo. The parties have
17 also agreed that the policy benefits should be paid into a blocked trust account for each of the
18 minor children. The parties’ stipulation is filed concurrently herewith. The birth certificates of
19 Leovigildo Elena-Martinez and Michael Elena-Martinez are attached as an exhibit to the stipulation
20 to allow the Court to find that they are the children of Juana Toledo. However, Defendants prefer
21 that the birth certificates are not made part of the public record.
22
II.
23
LEGAL ANALYSIS
24
LR 10-5(b) requires that papers filed with this Court under seal shall be accompanied by a
25 motion for leave to file those documents under seal, and shall be filed in accordance with the
26 Court’s electronic filing procedures, giving directions as to how that process shall be accomplished.
27 The rule further provides that all papers filed under seal will remain sealed until such time as the
LEWIS
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
28 / / /
4851-3937-3075.1
2
2:10-cv-01434-MMD-RJJ
Case 2:12-cv-02026-JAD-VCF Document 35 Filed 09/18/13 Page 3 of 5
1 Court may deny the motion to seal or enter an order to unseal them, or the documents are unsealed
2 pursuant to Local Rule. See id. Documents filed under seal are not accessible to the public.
3
Under the circumstances of this case, even under the standards announced in Kamakana v.
4 City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178-79 (9th Cir. 2006), there is no compelling
5 reason why the birth certificates of Leovigildo Elena-Martinez and Michael Elena-Martinez should
6 be made public. In Kamakana, the Ninth Circuit recognized that, historically, courts have
7 recognized a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial
8 records and documents. Nonetheless, the Kamakana court also recognized that access to judicial
9 records was not absolute. The Kamakana court also wrote that resolution of a dispute on the merits
10 was at the heart of the interest in ensuring the “public’s understanding of the judicial process and of
11 significant public events.” Only if the documents to be sealed are attached to dispositive motions
12 need the party seeking the order meet the high threshold of showing that “compelling reasons”
13 support secrecy.
14
The document to which this petition is directed does not involve a dispositive motion under
15 Rule 12. Although the stipulation and order will result in disposition of this matter, making the
16 birth certificates part of the public record will not aid the public in understanding the judicial
17 process, nor is the context of these documents, the payment of policy benefits under an insurance
18 policy, a significant public event. The public has no need of the information which the birth
19 certificates contain. In fact, public knowledge of the private information of Defendants contained
20 therein could negatively impact Defendants and is against the public interest. The public interest
21 will best be served by ensuring that the information contained in the birth certificates remains
22 private.
23
24
CONCLUSION
25
As shown herein, good cause exists to warrant an Order from this Court pursuant to LR 10-
26 5(b) which will permit the parties to file under seal Exhibit “A” to the Stipulation for Deposit of
27 Funds Into Blocked Account and Discharge Of Liability; Order Thereon.
LEWIS
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
28 / / /
4851-3937-3075.1
3
2:10-cv-01434-MMD-RJJ
Case 2:12-cv-02026-JAD-VCF Document 35 Filed 09/18/13 Page 4 of 5
1
WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request entry of the following orders:
2
1. An order granting the parties leave to file Exhibit “A” to the Stipulation for Deposit of
3 Funds Into Blocked Account and Discharge Of Liability; Order Thereon under seal;
4
2. Such Orders and further relief as this Court may deem necessary and proper in the
5 circumstances of this case.
6
DATED this 18th day of September, 2013.
7
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH
LLP
8
9
10
By
11
12
13
14
15
16
/s/ Priscilla L. O’Briant
V. ANDREW CASS
Nevada Bar No. 005246
PRISCILLA L. O’BRIANT
Nevada Bar No. 10171
6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Tel. 702.893.3383
Attorneys for Plaintiff
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
October 2
Dated: __________________, 2013
18
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Magistrate
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
LEWIS
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
28
4851-3937-3075.1
4
2:10-cv-01434-MMD-RJJ
Case 2:12-cv-02026-JAD-VCF Document 35 Filed 09/18/13 Page 5 of 5
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 5(b), I certify that I am an employee of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard &
3 Smith LLP and that on this 18th day of September, 2013, I did cause a true copy of the foregoing
4 MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL EXHIBIT A TO STIPULATION FOR DEPOSIT OF
5 FUNDS INTO BLOCKED ACCOUNT AND DISCHARGE OF LIABILITY to be served via
6 electronic service by the U.S. District Court CM/ECF system to the parties on the Electronic Mail
7 Notice List.
8
9
By:
10
11
/s/ Priscilla L. O’Briant
An Employee of
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
LEWIS
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
28
4851-3937-3075.1
5
2:10-cv-01434-MMD-RJJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?