Gale, et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc., et al
Filing
60
ORDER Granting 59 Motion for Bond Exoneration. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the bond posted by Andrea B. Gale on November 26, 2012 (Receipt No. 2012-144958- CCCLK) in the amount of TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS be released and the monies returned to AND REA B. GALE, forthwith, by the Clerk of the Eighth Judicial District Court for Clark County, Nevada in Case No. A-12-670503-C. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/26/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - certified copy mailed to Eighth Judicial District Court - SLD)
Case 2:12-cv-02065-GMN-VCF Document 59 Filed 03/02/13 Page 1 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
ROBERT J. FLUMMERFELT, ESQ.
Nevada Bar #11122
CANON LAW SERVICES, LLC
CanonLawServices@Gmail.com
7251 W. Lake Mead Blvd., Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89128
Telephone: (702) 562-4144
Facsimile (702) 866-9868
Attorney for Plaintiff Andrea Gale
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
11
ANDREA B. GALE, an individual, and as
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-02065-GMN-VCF
Trustee of Andrea Beryl Gale Revocable Living
Trust,
12
13
14
15
16
17
!
!"#$#%&"'%()*+,-)./%&&!%
0123%45%&"6)%7)"8%9:+85/%(;,<)%=>>%
&".%?)@"./%A)+"8"%BC31B%
D0>1E%2F1GH3HH%
10
18
Plaintiff,
MOTION FOR EXONERATION AND
DISCHARGE OF BOND
v.
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; NATIONSTAR
MORTGAGE, LLC; CAL-WESTERN
RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION;
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE as trustee, and
DOES 1 through 10, and ROE
CORPORATIONS 1 through 10, inclusive,
AND ORDER
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
______________________________________
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION,
Indispensable Party.
23
24
25
26
27
28
COMES NOW, ANDREA B. GALE (“Plaintiff”), by and through her attorney of record,
Robert J. Flummerfelt, Esq., hereby submits this motion for exoneration and discharge of bond,
based on the Memorandum of Point and Authorities, the Affidavit of Andrea B. Gale, all papers
on file herein, and any oral argument the court may entertain at a hearing on the matter.
- Page 1 of 5 -
Case 2:12-cv-02065-GMN-VCF Document 59 Filed 03/02/13 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:12-cv-02065-GMN-VCF Document 59 Filed 03/02/13 Page 3 of 5
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
1
2
I.
BACKGROUND
3
This action was originally filed in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada, on
4
October 18, 2012. On December 4, 2012, Defendant Quality Loan Service Corp removed this
5
action to this U.S. District Court. However, just prior to the removal, Plaintiff filed a motion for
6
7
injunctive relief from the state court, to enjoin Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie
Mae”) from evicting Plaintiff from her home. On November 26, 2012, the court issued a
9
Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) to maintain the status quo until a hearing on Plaintiff’s
10
motion for preliminary injunction could be held. (See, TRO, Ex.1). The court set the bond for the
11
TRO in the amount of $2,000.00.
12
13
14
On November 26, 2012, Plaintiff posted the bond for
$2,000.00 dollars, with the Clerk of the District Court, Clark County, Nevada. (See, Bond
Receipt, Ex. 2).
15
On December 28, 2012, this Court held the hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary
16
injunction, and on January 11, 2013, the Court entered an order denying Plaintiff’s motion for
17
!
!"#$#%&"'%()*+,-)./%&&!%
0123%45%&"6)%7)"8%9:+85/%(;,<)%=>>%
&".%?)@"./%A)+"8"%BC31B%
D0>1E%2F1GH3HH%
8
18
19
preliminary injunction, and the TRO expired. On or about January 18, 2013, Fannie Mae evicted
Plaintiff from the property and is now in possession of the property.
II.
ARGUMENT
A.
20
21
THE BOND SHOULD BE EXONERATED BECAUSE ALL CONDITIONS
FOR THE BOND HAVE BEEN SATISFIED AND ARE NOW MOOT
22
Since January 11, 2013, the TRO has expired, the preliminary injunction was denied, and
23
Fannie Mae has taken possession of the property. Since all grounds for the posting of the bond
24
are now moot, the bond should be exonerated and discharged back to Plaintiff as soon as
25
26
27
28
practicable. Plaintiff is currently without a permanent home and is in need of the bond money to
secure a new residence.
///
- Page 3 of 5 -
Case 2:12-cv-02065-GMN-VCF Document 59 Filed 03/02/13 Page 4 of 5
CONCLUSION
1
2
3
4
5
6
Based on the above, Plaintiff respectfully requests this Court enter an order directing the
Clerk of the District Court, Clark County, Nevada, to release the bond and return the sum of
$2,000.00 to Plaintiff.
Dated this 3rd day of March, 2013.
7
11
/s/ Robert Flummerfelt_____________
ROBERT J. FLUMMERFELT, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 11122
CANON LAW SERVICES, LLC
CanonLawServices@Gmail.com
7251 W. Lake Mead Blvd., Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89128
Telephone: (702) 562-4144
Facsimile (702) 866-9868
12
Attorney for Plaintiff
8
9
13
14
15
16
17
!
!"#$#%&"'%()*+,-)./%&&!%
0123%45%&"6)%7)"8%9:+85/%(;,<)%=>>%
&".%?)@"./%A)+"8"%BC31B%
D0>1E%2F1GH3HH%
10
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER
The Court having read the foregoing Motion for Exoneration and Discharge of
Bond, and the Affidavit of Andrea B. Gale, and the Memorandum of Points and
Authorities in Support of the Motion, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby
orders as follows:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the bond posted by Andrea B. Gale on
November 26, 2012 (Receipt No. 2012-144958-CCCLK) in the amount of TWO
THOUSAND DOLLARS be released and the monies returned to ANDREA B. GALE,
forthwith, by the Clerk of the Eighth Judicial District Court for Clark County, Nevada
in Case No. A-12-670503-C.
DATED this 26th day of March, 2013.
25
26
27
28
_____________________________
Gloria M. Navarro
United States District Judge
- Page 4 of 5 -
Case 2:12-cv-02065-GMN-VCF Document 59-1 Filed 03/02/13 Page 1 of 2
!"#$%$&'()*'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
!"#$%$&'()*'
Case 2:12-cv-02065-GMN-VCF Document 59-1 Filed 03/02/13 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:12-cv-02065-GMN-VCF Document 59-2 Filed 03/02/13 Page 1 of 2
!"#$%$&'()*'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
!"#$%$&'()*'
'
Case 2:12-cv-02065-GMN-VCF Document 59-2 Filed 03/02/13 Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?