Kelly v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
Filing
164
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 133 Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/6/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
GREGORY KELLY,
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:12-cv-02074-LRH-CWH
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff Gregory Kelly’s (“Kelly”) Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default
16
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). Doc. #133.1 Defendants John Campbell
17
(“Campbell”) and Christopher Garcia (“Garcia”) filed a Response (Doc. #134), to which Kelly
18
replied (Doc. #140).
19
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), a clerk’s entry of default is appropriate
20
when “a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or
21
otherwise defend as provided by these rules . . . .” Kelly asserts that by failing to answer his
22
Amended Complaint, Campbell and Garcia are subject to default. See Doc. #133. The Court
23
disagrees. Here, Campbell and Garcia filed a Motion to Dismiss, evidencing their intent to defend
24
against Kelly’s claims. See Doc. #106. The Court finds Campbell and Garcia’s action in this
25
26
1
Refers to the Court’s docket number.
1
regard to fall squarely within the ambit of the phrase “otherwise defend.” See Rashidi v. Albright,
2
818 F. Supp. 1354, 1355-56 (D. Nev. 1993) (“[i]t is undisputed that a motion challenging a
3
complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted falls squarely within the
4
ambit of the phrase ‘otherwise defend’”). Accordingly, clerk’s entry of default pursuant to Federal
5
Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) is not warranted.
6
7
8
9
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Kelly’s Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default (Doc.
#133) is DENIED.
DATED this 6th day of May, 2014.
10
__________________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?