Kelly v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
Filing
30
ORDER Denying without prejudice 29 Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/5/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
GREGORY KELLY,
9
10
11
12
13
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN
)
POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:12-cv-02074-LRH-CWH
ORDER
14
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#29),
15
filed March 4, 2013.
16
Plaintiff’s proposed discovery plan does not comply with Local Rule 26-1(d), which
17
requires a plaintiff to initiate the Rule 26(f) conference “within thirty (30) days after the first
18
defendant answers or otherwise appears.” The parties are required to submit a stipulated discovery
19
plan and scheduling order within fourteen days after the Rule 26(f) conference. LR 26-1(d). A
20
pending dispositive motion is not, standing alone, sufficient to curtail or limit the requirement that
21
parties participate in a Rule 26(f) conference. See Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc., 278 F.R.D. 597,
22
600-01 (D. Nev. 2011) (“The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for automatic or
23
blanket stays of discovery when a potentially dispositive motion is pending.”). Plaintiff is
24
instructed to initiate the Rule 26(f) conference. The parties are reminded that the failure “to
25
participate in good faith in developing and submitting a proposed discovery plan” may result in
26
sanctions. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(f).
27
Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing therefore,
28
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Plaintiff’s Discovery Plan and Scheduling
1
2
Order (#29) is denied without prejudice.
DATED this 5th day of March, 2013.
3
4
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?