Kelly v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 30

ORDER Denying without prejudice 29 Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/5/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 GREGORY KELLY, 9 10 11 12 13 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN ) POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:12-cv-02074-LRH-CWH ORDER 14 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#29), 15 filed March 4, 2013. 16 Plaintiff’s proposed discovery plan does not comply with Local Rule 26-1(d), which 17 requires a plaintiff to initiate the Rule 26(f) conference “within thirty (30) days after the first 18 defendant answers or otherwise appears.” The parties are required to submit a stipulated discovery 19 plan and scheduling order within fourteen days after the Rule 26(f) conference. LR 26-1(d). A 20 pending dispositive motion is not, standing alone, sufficient to curtail or limit the requirement that 21 parties participate in a Rule 26(f) conference. See Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc., 278 F.R.D. 597, 22 600-01 (D. Nev. 2011) (“The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for automatic or 23 blanket stays of discovery when a potentially dispositive motion is pending.”). Plaintiff is 24 instructed to initiate the Rule 26(f) conference. The parties are reminded that the failure “to 25 participate in good faith in developing and submitting a proposed discovery plan” may result in 26 sanctions. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(f). 27 Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing therefore, 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Plaintiff’s Discovery Plan and Scheduling 1 2 Order (#29) is denied without prejudice. DATED this 5th day of March, 2013. 3 4 ______________________________________ C.W. Hoffman, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?