Mitchell v. Cox et al
Filing
24
ORDER Granting 13 Plaintiff's Motion Identifying Unserved Defendants and Requesting Issuance of Summons. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue Summons for Defendant Nathan Courtney and deliver a copy of the Summons and Complaint to the United States Marshal for service. The Clerk shall send Plaintiff a blank Form USM-285. Plaintiff shall fill in the form, except that the address for Defendant Courtney will be filled in by the United States Marshal. Plaintiff shall ret urn the Form USM-285 to the Marshal within 21 days of receipt of the Form. The Nevada Attorney Generals Office shall, within 21 days, file a notice advising whether it will accept service on behalf of Defendants Espinoza and Guerro. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/31/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CC: USMS, Blank USM-285 Forms sent to Plaintiff - AC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
12
13
TARZ MITCHELL,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
GREG COX, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
2:12-cv-02082-JAD-CWH
ORDER
14
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion Identifying Unserved Defendants and
15
Requesting Issuance of Summons (#13), filed July 30, 2013. Pursuant to the Court’s instruction in its
16
order granting the application to proceed in forma pauperis (#8), Plaintiff has filed a motion identifying
17
the unserved defendants and requesting issuance of summons for Defendant Nathan Courtney. The
18
Nevada Attorney General’s Office has filed a notice of the last known address, under seal, for Defendant
19
Nathan Courtney. Consequently, the Clerk shall issue summons for Defendant Courtney and deliver a
20
copy of the Summons and Complaint to the United States Marshal for service pursuant to Rule 4(c)(3).
21
The Clerk shall send Plaintiff a blank Form USM-285, which Plaintiff shall submit to the United States
22
Marshal prior to service on Defendant Courtney.
23
In his motion, Plaintiff provides additional information to aid the Nevada Attorney General’s
24
Office in determining the identity of certain defendants. Consistent with the requirements set forth order
25
(#8), the Nevada Attorney General’s Office shall, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of entry of
26
this order, file a notice advising whether it will accept service on behalf of Defendants Espinoza and
27
Guerro based on the additional information provided by Plaintiff in his motion (#13). If unable to accept
28
1
service, the Attorney General’s office shall file, under seal, the last known addresses of Defendants
2
Espinoza and Guerro if it has the information.
3
Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing therefore,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion Identifying Unserved Defendants and
5
Requesting Issuance of Summons (#13) is granted.
6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue Summons for Defendant Nathan
7
Courtney and deliver a copy of the Summons and Complaint to the United States Marshal for service.
8
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall send Plaintiff a blank Form USM-285.
9
Plaintiff shall fill in the form, except that the address for Defendant Courtney will be filled in by the
10
United States Marshal. Plaintiff shall return the Form USM-285 to the Marshal within twenty-one (21)
11
days of receipt of the Form.
12
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Nevada Attorney General’s Office shall, within twenty-
13
one (21) days of the date of entry of this order, file a notice advising whether it will accept service on
14
behalf of Defendants Espinoza and Guerro based on the additional information provided by Plaintiff in
15
his motion (#13). If unable to accept service, the Attorney General’s office shall file, under seal, the last
16
known addresses of Defendants Espinoza and Guerro if it has such information.
17
DATED: October 31, 2013.
18
19
20
_________________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?