Orr v. Nevada State Board of Osteopathic Medicine et al

Filing 54

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 52 the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 40 Defendant Nevada State Board of Osteopathic Medicine's (Defendant's) Motion to Attorney's Fees is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall be awarded attorneys fees in the amount of $8,002.00. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/28/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
MARIAN ORR, D.O.,
4
5
6
7

Plaintiff,
vs.
NEVADA STATE BOARD OF
OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE et al.,

8

Defendants.

9

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 2:12-cv-2119-GMN-VCF
ORDER

10
11
12
13

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach (ECF No. 52), entered on December 5, 2016.
A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a

14

United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B);

15

D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo

16

determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject,

17

or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.

18

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is

19

not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an

20

objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized

21

that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation

22

where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,

23

1122 (9th Cir. 2003).

24

Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed.

25

Accordingly,

Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 52) is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Nevada State Board of Osteopathic
Medicine’s (“Defendant’s”) Motion to Attorney’s Fees (ECF No. 40) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall be awarded attorney’s fees in the
amount of $8,002.00.
The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

8
9

DATED this ___ day of December, 2016.
28

10
11
12

___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Page 2 of 2