Carrillo v. Gillespie et al

Filing 129

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 122 Belated Motion to Extend Discovery. Plaintiff's 128 Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Opposition to his Motion to Extend Discovery is Denied. Defendants' 127 Motion to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline is Granted and the following extensions apply: Dispositive Motions due by 3/2/2014. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 4/3/2014. All else as stated in the 56 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order remains unchanged. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/2/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4

***

5
6
7

GILBERTO CARRILLO,

8
9
10
11

Plaintiff,
vs.

2:12-cv-02165-JCM-VCF
ORDER

DOUGLAS GILLESPIE, et al.,
Defendants.

12
13
14

Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Belated Motion to Extend Discovery (#122) and Defendants’
Motion to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline (#127).

15

I. Plaintiff’s Belated Motion to Extend Discovery (#122)

16

In Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Discovery, he seeks to extend discovery by sixty days. (#122).

17

On December 6, 2013, Defendants filed their Opposition to Plaintiff’s Belated Motion to Extend

18

Discovery. (#124). Defendants argue that pursuant to Local Rule 26-4, requests to extend discovery

19

must be filed at least twenty-one days prior to the date fixed for completion of discovery by the

20

scheduling order and Plaintiff has failed to comply with this rule. Defendants state that Plaintiff’s

21

Motion is barren of facts which demonstrate why an additional extension of discovery is necessary. Id.

22

II. Defendants’ Motion to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline (#127)

23

Defendants seek to extend dispositive motion deadline and the deadline to file a joint pre-trial

24

order. Two of the three Defendants seeking relief have pending Motions to Dismiss (#’s 63 & 92) and

25

no trial date has been set.

1

III. Discussion

2

Plaintiff failed to provide the Court a reason to extend discovery deadlines. Plaintiff leaves it up

3

to the Court and Defendants’ to determine if any discovery remains. Pursuant to LR 26-4, Plaintiff

4

failed to timely file his request to extend discovery cut-off and has not demonstrated excusable neglect

5

associated with his failure to timely comply. Plaintiff’s Belated Motion to Extend Discovery (#122) is

6

denied.

7

Defendant’s Opposition to his Motion to Extend Discovery (#128) and it is denied.

The Court has considered Plaintiff’s Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to

8

Accordingly,

9

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Belated Motion to Extend Discovery (#122) is

10
11
12
13
14

DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to
Defendant’s Opposition to his Motion to Extend Discovery (#128) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline
(#127) is GRANTED and the following extensions apply:

15

1.

Dispositive Motions shall be filed and served no later than March 2, 2014.

16

2.

The Joint Pretrial Order is due thirty (30) days after the dispositive motions deadline, or

17

on April 3, 2014. If dispositive motions are filed, the joint pretrial order is due thirty (30) days from the

18

entry of the court’s rulings on the motions or by further order of the court.

19

All else as stated in the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#56) remains unchanged.

20

DATED this 2nd day of January, 2014.
_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
2