Avramski v. United States et al

Filing 11

ORDER Granting 8 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Answer 1 Complaint. United States answer due 4/10/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 03/12/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

Download PDF
Case 2:12-cv-02167-GMN-CWH Document 8 Filed 03/11/13 Page 1 of 3 1 6 DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney District of Nevada Nevada Bar No. 2137 CARLOS A. GONZALEZ Assistant United States Attorney 333 Las Vegas Blvd. So., #5000 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Ph: (702) 388-6336 Fax: (702) 388-6787 E-mail: Carlos.Gonzalez2@usdoj.gov 7 Attorneys for the United States. 2 3 4 5 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 BORIS ANGUELOV AVRAMSKI, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 UNITED STATES, et al., 14 Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:12-cv-02167 UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 30 DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER, PLEAD, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND DECLARATORY RELIEF 15 16 The United States of America by and through Daniel G. 17 Bogden, United States Attorney for the District of Nevada, and 18 Carlos A. Gonzalez, Assistant United States Attorney, without 19 waiving any defenses that may be available in this case, for the 20 reasons set forth below, the Defendants move this Court for an 21 unopposed 30-day extension of time, from March 11, 2013, to and 22 including April 10, 2013, by which to answer, plead, or otherwise 23 respond to Boris Anguelov Avramski’s (“Plaintiff”) Petition for 24 Writ of Mandamus and Declaratory Relief (“Complaint”). 25 ... 26 ... Case 2:12-cv-02167-GMN-CWH Document 8 Filed 03/11/13 Page 2 of 3 Plaintiff has petitioned the Court, inter alia, for a writ 1 2 of mandamus compelling the Defendants to grant his naturalization 3 application. 4 answer, plead, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint by 5 March 11, 2013. 6 respond, Defendants have been coordinating with agency counsel, 7 gathering documents, and determining their defenses. 8 Simultaneously, the parties to this action are exploring avenues 9 to resolve this litigation. 10 Defendants have been diligently preparing to In preparation to answer, plead, or otherwise As the parties seek to resolve the dispute giving rise to 11 this litigation, counsel for Defendants requests an additional 30 12 days to answer, plead, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s 13 Complaint. 14 matter, Defendants expect to be in position to answer, plead, or 15 otherwise respond to the Plaintiff’s Complaint by April 10, 2013. 16 Should the parties not be able to resolve this Counsel for the Defendants has conferred with counsel for 17 Plaintiff, Peter L. Ashman, who has no opposition to this request 18 for an extension of time. 19 ... 20 ... 21 ... 22 ... 23 ... 24 ... 25 ... 26 ... -2- Case 2:12-cv-02167-GMN-CWH Document 8 Filed 03/11/13 Page 3 of 3 -- 1 2 Accordingly, Defendants request an extension of time, from 3 March 11, 2013, to and including April 10, 2013, by which to 4 answer, plead, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. 5 Dated: March 11, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 6 7 DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney 8 //s// Carlos A. Gonzalez Assistant United States Attorney 9 10 11 OF COUNSEL: 12 STUART F. DELERY Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Civil Division DAVID J. KLINE Office of Immigration Litigation Director, District Court Section SAMUEL P. GO Office of Immigration Litigation Senior Litigation Counsel, District Court Section JOHN J. W. INKELES Office of Immigration Litigation U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division Trial Attorney, District Court Section P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 Tel: (202) 532-4209 Fax: (202) 305-7000 john.inkeles@usdoj.gov Counsel for Defendants 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 12, 2013. 24 25 _________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?