Flores v. Astrue

Filing 19

ORDER adopting 18 Report and Recommendations and denying 8 Motion to Remand to Social Security Administration. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that 10 Defendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm be GRANTED. The Clerk enters judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/30/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 ROSARIO D. FLORES, Case No.: 2:12-cv-02192-RFB-CWH Plaintiff, 5 vs. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARL W. HOFFMAN 6 7 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant. 8 9 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 18) of 10 11 the Honorable Carl W. Hoffman, United States Magistrate Judge, entered August 14, 2014. 12 Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by August 28, 2014. No objections 13 have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with Magistrate 14 Judge’s recommendation(s) that (ECF No.8) Motion to Remand to Social Security 15 Administration be DENIED. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that (ECF No. 10) 16 Defendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm be GRANTED. Therefore, the Court has determined that 17 Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation should be ACCEPTED and ADOPTED to the extent that 18 it is not inconsistent with this opinion. 19 ... 20 ... 21 ... 22 23 24 25 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation ECF No. 18) is 2 ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. (ECF No.8) Motion to Remand to Social Security 3 Administration be DENIED. 4 5 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that (ECF No. 10) Defendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm be GRANTED. 6 The Clerk enters judgment accordingly and close the case. 7 DATED this 30thday of October, 2014. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ____________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE II United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?