Plank v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
Filing
41
ORDER Granting 40 Stipulation to Extend Responses to 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 7/10/2015. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/5/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
Case 2:12-cv-02205-JCM-PAL Document 40 Filed 05/04/15 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1988
C. J. POTTER, IV, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13225
POTTER LAW OFFICES
1125 Shadow Lane
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Tel: (702) 385-1954
Fax: (702) 385-9081
KRISTINE K. JENSEN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9302
KRISTINE K. JENSEN, LTD.
529 S. Tenth Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Tel: (702) 822-2772
Fax: (702) 822-2774
Attorneys for Plaintiff
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
•••••
13
DAVID EDWIN PLANK,
14
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:12-cv-02205-JCM-PAL
15
vs.
16
17
18
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN
POLICE DEPARTMENT, a political
subdivision of the State of Nevada;
OFFICER B. MAYORAL, individually;
and JOHN DOES I-X, inclusive,
19
20
Defendants.
__________________________________________/
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSES TO MOTIONS FOR
22
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REPLIES THERETO
23
(First Request)
24
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Plaintiff, DAVID
25
EDWIN PLANK, by and through his counsel, CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ. and C. J. POTTER, IV,
26
ESQ. of POTTER LAW OFFICES and KRISTINE K. JENSEN, ESQ.; Defendant, LAS VEGAS
27
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT by and through their attorney THOMAS D.
28
DILLARD, ESQ. of OLSON CANNON GORMLEY ANGULO & STOBERSKI; and Defendant,
Case 2:12-cv-02205-JCM-PAL Document 40 Filed 05/04/15 Page 2 of 3
1
OFFICER B. MAYORAL by and through his attorney ROBERT W. FREEMAN, JR., ESQ. of
2
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH that the date for Plaintiff’s Response to the Defendant
3
LVMPD’s Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. 36] currently due Monday, May 4, 2015 be
4
extended up to and including Friday, July 10, 2015. The Plaintiff requests this large extension in
5
order for the Response to coincide with the filing of the Response to Defendant Officer Mayoral’s
6
Summary Judgment.1
7
Plaintiff submits that good cause exists for this extension as Plaintiff’s counsel has been
8
unable to complete the Response due to other deadlines, numerous appearances, and multiple
9
depositions. Based upon the foregoing, the parties request that this Court order the time for the
10
Plaintiff to file his Responses to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment to Friday, July 10,
11
2015.
12
13
14
This is the first request for enlargement of time is made in good faith and not for the purposes
of delay.
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT.
15
DATED this 4th day of May, 2015.
DATED this 4th day of May, 2015.
16
POTTER LAW OFFICES
KRISTINE K. JENSEN, LTD.
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH
By
/s/ Cal J. Potter, III, Esq.
CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1988
C. J. POTTER, IV, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13225
1125 Shadow Lane
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
By
/s/ Robert W. Freeman, Jr., Esq.
ROBERT W. FREEMAN, JR., ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 3062
6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Attorney for Defendant, Officer Mayoral
KRISTINE K. JENSEN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9302
3401 West Charleston Blvd.
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OLSON, CANNON, GORMLEY,
ANGULO & STOBERSKI
17
18
19
20
DATED this 4th day of May, 2015.
21
22
23
By /s/ Thomas D. Dillard, Esq.
THOMAS D. DILLARD, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6271
9950 West Cheyenne Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89129
Attorneys for Defendant, LVMPD
24
25
26
27
28
1
Defendant Officer Mayoral’s dispositive motion deadline was extended to June 3, 2015 [doc. 39].
2
Case 2:12-cv-02205-JCM-PAL Document 40 Filed 05/04/15 Page 3 of 3
1
ORDER
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
May 5, 2015
________________
DATED
________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?