Murray v. Williams et al

Filing 5

ORDER Granting 1 Petitioner's Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Denying 2 Petitioner's Ex Parte Motion for the Appointment of counsel; and Granting 3 Petitioner's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. The clerk SHALL FILE the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the petition upon the Respondents. Respondents shall have 45 days from entry of this order within which to answer, or othe rwise respond to, the petition. The hard copy of all state court record exhibits shall be forwarded, for this case, to the staff attorneys in the Reno division of the clerk of court. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 04/09/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10
STEVEN NELSON MURRAY,
11
12
13
14
15

)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, et al.,
)
)
Respondents.
)
____________________________________/

2:12-cv-02212-JCM-VCF
ORDER

16
This action is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254,
17
by a Nevada state prisoner.
18
Petitioner has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1). Based on the
19
information regarding petitioner's financial status, the court grants the motion to proceed in forma
20
pauperis.
21
Petitioner has filed a motion to file a petition that exceeds the page limit. (ECF No. 3). As to
22
the petition on file, and with good cause appearing, the motion is granted.
23
Petitioner has filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 2). There is no
24
constitutional right to appointed counsel for a federal habeas corpus proceeding. Pennsylvania v.
25
Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987); Bonin v. Vasquez, 999 F.2d 425, 428 (9th Cir. 1993). The
26

1

decision to appoint counsel is generally discretionary. Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th

2

Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1023 (1987); Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1234 (9th Cir.),

3

cert. denied, 469 U.S. 838 (1984). The petition on file in this action is well-written and sufficiently

4

clear in presenting the issues that petitioner wishes to bring. The issues in this case are not complex.

5

It does not appear that counsel is justified in this instance. The motion is denied.

6

The petition shall now be filed and served on respondents. A petition for federal habeas

7

corpus should include all claims for relief of which petitioner is aware. If petitioner fails to include

8

such a claim in his petition, he may be forever barred from seeking federal habeas relief upon that

9

claim. See 28 U.S.C. §2254(b) (successive petitions).

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF
No. 1) is GRANTED. The clerk SHALL FILE the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion to file a petition that exceeds the
page limit (ECF No. 3), as to the petition on file, is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF
No. 2) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the
petition (ECF No. 1-1) upon the respondents.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from entry of

19

this order within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the petition. In their answer or other

20

response, respondents shall address all claims presented in the petition. Respondents shall raise all

21

potential affirmative defenses in the initial responsive pleading, including lack of exhaustion and

22

procedural default. Successive motions to dismiss will not be entertained. If an answer is filed,

23

respondents shall comply with the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Proceedings in the

24

United States District Courts under 28 U.S.C. §2254. If an answer is filed, petitioner shall have

25

forty-five (45) days from the date of service of the answer to file a reply.

26

2

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any state court record exhibits filed by respondents shall

2

be filed with a separate index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number or letter. The hard copy

3

of all state court record exhibits shall be forwarded, for this case, to the staff attorneys in the Reno

4

division of the clerk of court.

5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, henceforth, petitioner shall serve upon the attorney

6

general of the state of Nevada a copy of every pleading, motion, or other document he submits for

7

consideration by the court. Petitioner shall include with the original paper submitted for filing a

8

certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document was mailed to the attorney

9

general. The court may disregard any paper that does not include a certificate of service. After

10

respondents appear in this action, petitioner shall make such service upon the particular deputy

11

attorney general assigned to the case.

12

April 9, 2013.
Dated this ______ day of April, 2013.

13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

3