Barlow v. Herman et al

Filing 92

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 91 Plaintiff Randall Bruce Barlow's Renewed Motion for Clerk's Entry of Default Against Defendant Willow Creek San Martin Building, LLC is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court must enter default as to Defendant Willow Creek San Martin Building, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/20/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 ****** 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 RANDALL BRUCE BARLOW, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) ) DONALD S. HERMAN, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:13-cv-00033-JAD-CWH ORDER Presently before the court is Plaintiff Randall Bruce Barlow’s Renewed Motion for Clerk’s 13 Entry of Default Against Defendant Willow Creek San Martin Building, LLC (ECF No. 91), filed on 14 December 15, 2016. The court previously denied Plaintiff’s request for the entry of default as to 15 Defendant Willow Creek San Martin Building, LLC because that defendant had filed a notice of 16 bankruptcy and the parties’ attorneys were unable to update the court regarding the status of the 17 bankruptcy. (Order (ECF No. 89).) Plaintiff now provides the bankruptcy court’s order granting 18 Willow Creek San Martin Building, LLC’s motion for voluntary dismissal of its bankruptcy case. 19 (Renewed Mot. for Entry of Default (ECF No. 91) at Exs. 4-5.) In light of the bankruptcy dismissal 20 order, the court will grant the renewed motion. 21 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff Randall Bruce Barlow’s Renewed Motion for 22 Clerk’s Entry of Default Against Defendant Willow Creek San Martin Building, LLC (ECF No. 91) is 23 GRANTED. 24 25 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court must enter default as to Defendant Willow Creek San Martin Building, LLC. 26 27 28 DATED: December 20, 2016 ______________________________________ C.W. Hoffman, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?