V'Guara Inc. v. Steve Dec et al
Filing
102
ORDER denying without prejudice 9 Motion for Preliminary Injunction to its refiling after a decision on the motion for summary judgment 96 . Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 8/19/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
V’Guara, Inc.,
Case No.: 2:13-cv-0076-JAD-NJK
9
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
v.
Steve Dec, an individual; S& D Beverage, LLC,
Order Denying Motion for
Preliminary Injunction without
Prejudice
[Doc. 9]
Defendants.
13
14
15
On January 25, 2013, Plaintiff V’Guara, Inc. filed a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
16
and Preliminary Injunction. Docs. 8, 9. District Court Judge Miranda Du granted the motion for
17
temporary restraining order on February 15, 2013, Doc. 18, and the parties stipulated to extend the
18
duration of the temporary restraining order until the court issues a merits ruling on the motion for
19
preliminary injunction. Doc. 36. The parties further stipulated that the court could set the hearing
20
on the motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 9) “in its discretion.” Doc. 36.
21
On August 18, 2014, the court held a scheduling conference to set the hearing on the motion
22
for preliminary injunction. Doc. 9. The parties requested that the court first rule on the recently
23
filed and not-yet-fully-briefed motion for summary judgment (Doc. 96) before setting the
24
preliminary-injunction hearing. In light of this request, and because (1) the parties have stipulated to
25
keep the temporary restraining order in effect until the court considers the merits of the motion for
26
preliminary injunction and (2) the likelihood of the need to supplement the preliminary injunction
27
briefing in light of case developments since the original filing of the motion, IT IS HEREBY
28
Page 1 of 2
1
ORDERED that the motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 9) is DENIED without prejudice to its
2
refiling after a decision on the motion for summary judgment (Doc. 96). This without-prejudice
3
denial is not intended, and shall not be construed, as the court’s issuance of “a ruling on V’GUARA
4
INC’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction” as that phrase is used in the stipulated extension of the
5
temporary restraining order (Doc. 36).
6
7
8
Dated: August 19, 2014.
_________________________________
JENNIFER A. DORSEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?