Ballard et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 50

ORDER that Plaintiffs are to file a notice with the Court, no later than 10/17/2014, indicating the address at which they will be receiving case-related material. In light of the confusion as to Plaintiffs' mailing address, the Clerk's Office is INSTRUCTED to mail notice of this order to both the address provided at Docket 31 and theaddress provided at Docket No. 28 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/3/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - mailed as ordered - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 FREDRICA C. BALLARD, et al., 8 Plaintiff(s), 9 10 vs. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:13-cv-00130-APG-NJK ORDER “A party, not the district court, bears the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes 14 in [her] mailing address.” Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also In re 15 Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). Additionally, Local Special Rule 2-2 requires that 16 plaintiffs immediately file with the Court written notification of any change of address, and expressly 17 warns that failure to do so may result in dismissal of the action with prejudice. Local Special Rule 18 2-2 applies to pro se plaintiffs, such as plaintiffs here. See, e.g., Hoilien v. Bank of America, 2011 19 WL 933775, *1 (D. Nev. Mar. 16, 2011) (citing ACV Int’l, LLC v. White, 2008 WL 5273694, *2 (D. 20 Nev. Dec. 16, 2008)). 21 The Court has now received notices that mail was undeliverable and that no new address is 22 available. See Docket No. 46; see also Docket Nos. 32-33, 36-38. It also appears, however, that 23 Plaintiffs’ amended complaint provided a new address in the caption. See Docket No. 31. To 24 comply with the requirement to update an address, parties should file a “notice of changed address” 25 to make clear to the Court that they are changing their address. The Court is unclear from the filings 26 whether Plaintiffs have actually changed their mailing address at this time. 27 28 Accordingly, Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to file a notice with the Court, no later than October 17, 2014, indicating the address at which they will be receiving case-related mailings. The 1 failure to comply with this order will result in an order to show cause why sanctions should not be 2 imposed, up to and including case-dispositive sanctions. 3 In light of the confusion as to Plaintiffs’ mailing address, the Clerk’s Office is 4 INSTRUCTED to mail notice of this order to both the address provided at Docket No. 31 and the 5 address provided at Docket No. 28. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 DATED: October 3, 2014 8 9 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?