Okada v. Wynn Resorts, Limited
Filing
13
ORDER re 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Kazuo Okada. Responses due by 2/6/2013. Replies due by 2/11/2013. Motion Hearing set for 2/15/2013 11:00 AM in LV Courtroom 6A before Judge James C. Mahan. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/30/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
KAZUO OKADA, an individual,
9
10
11
12
2:13-CV-136 JCM (PAL)
Plaintiff(s),
v.
WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED, a
Nevada corporation,
13
Defendant(s).
14
15
16
17
ORDER
Presently before the court is plaintiff Kazuo Okada’s motion for a preliminary injunction.
(Doc. # 7).
18
Plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendant Wynn Resorts. Ltd. from holding a special meeting of
19
shareholders called for February 22, 2013. Plaintiff claims that the sole purpose of the meeting is to
20
ask the shareholders to vote to remove Okada as director of Wynn Resorts without any valid basis.
21
Plaintiff argues that a preliminary injunction is necessary to prevent the irreparable harm that will
22
otherwise result if Wynn Resorts’s shareholders vote on the company’s removal proposal.
23
24
Given the nature of the relief sought and the definite date on which harm may occur, the court
finds this matter appropriate for an expedited briefing schedule.
25
Accordingly,
26
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendant Wynn Resorts
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
shall have up to, and including, February 6, 2013, to file a response to the instant motion.
1
2
3
4
5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Kazuo Okada shall have up to, and including,
February 11, 2013, to file his reply.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing be held on this matter before this court on
February 15, 2013, at 11:00 a.m.
DATED January 30, 2013.
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?