Derosa v. Blood Systems, Inc.,

Filing 12

ORDER Denying 11 Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order due by 3/26/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/19/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 SUSAN DEROSA, 12 Plaintiff(s), 13 vs. 14 BLOOD SYSTEMS, INC., et al., 15 Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:13-cv-00137-JCM-NJK ORDER DENYING PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN (Docket No. 11) 16 17 Pending before the Court is the Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, Docket No. 18 11, which is hereby DENIED. The proposed discovery plan is deficient in a number of respects. 19 First, the Local Rules require proposed discovery plans to “state the date the first defendant 20 answered or otherwise appeared.” Local Rule 26-1(e)(1). The submitted discovery plan fails to do 21 so. Second, the presumptive discovery period is 180 days from the date the first defendant answers 22 or appears. Local Rule 26-1(e)(1). The proposed plan seeks additional time by calculating a 220- 23 day period from the date of the answer. See Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order at 2. 24 The parties provide no explanation why extended discovery is required. Third, requests for 25 extending discovery deadlines must be filed no later than 21 days before the subject deadline sought 26 to be extended. See Local Rule 26-4. The submitted discovery plan misstates Local Rule 26-4. See 27 Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order at 2. 28 // 1 2 Accordingly, the proposed discovery plan is DENIED. The parties are ordered, no later than March 26, 2013, to file another proposed discovery plan that complies with the Local Rules. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: March 19, 2013 5 6 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?