Derosa v. Blood Systems, Inc.,
Filing
12
ORDER Denying 11 Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order due by 3/26/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/19/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
SUSAN DEROSA,
12
Plaintiff(s),
13
vs.
14
BLOOD SYSTEMS, INC., et al.,
15
Defendant(s).
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:13-cv-00137-JCM-NJK
ORDER DENYING PROPOSED
DISCOVERY PLAN (Docket No. 11)
16
17
Pending before the Court is the Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, Docket No.
18
11, which is hereby DENIED. The proposed discovery plan is deficient in a number of respects.
19
First, the Local Rules require proposed discovery plans to “state the date the first defendant
20
answered or otherwise appeared.” Local Rule 26-1(e)(1). The submitted discovery plan fails to do
21
so. Second, the presumptive discovery period is 180 days from the date the first defendant answers
22
or appears. Local Rule 26-1(e)(1). The proposed plan seeks additional time by calculating a 220-
23
day period from the date of the answer. See Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order at 2.
24
The parties provide no explanation why extended discovery is required. Third, requests for
25
extending discovery deadlines must be filed no later than 21 days before the subject deadline sought
26
to be extended. See Local Rule 26-4. The submitted discovery plan misstates Local Rule 26-4. See
27
Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order at 2.
28
//
1
2
Accordingly, the proposed discovery plan is DENIED. The parties are ordered, no later than
March 26, 2013, to file another proposed discovery plan that complies with the Local Rules.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
DATED: March 19, 2013
5
6
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?