Federal Trade Commission v. Ideal Financial Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 160

ORDER Granting 157 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Megan A. Bartley is substituted in place and stead of Megan E. Gray for Federal Trade Commission. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/13/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 R. MICHAEL WALLER MEGAN A. BARTLEY Attorneys Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Mailstop M-8102B Washington, DC 20580 Phone: (202) 326-2902 (Waller) Phone: (202) 326-3424 (Bartley) Facsimile: (202) 326-2558 Email: rwaller@ftc.gov, mbartley@ftc.gov DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney District of Nevada BLAINE T. WELSH Assistant United States Attorney Nevada Bar No. 4790 333 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 5000 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Phone: (702) 388-6336 Facsimile: (702) 388-6787 Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 15 16 17 Federal Trade Commission, Case No.: 2:13-CV-00143-JAD-GWF Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 20 21 22 Ideal Financial Solutions, Inc., et al. . Defendants. SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY 23 Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission hereby substitutes Megan A. Bartley, 600 24 25 26 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Mailstop M-8102 B, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3424, as attorney of record in place and stead of Megan E. Gray. 27 28 1 1 2 DATED: 12/12/13 /s/ R. Michael Waller (Counsel for Plaintiff ) 3 4 5 6 I consent to the above substitution. DATED: 12/12/13 /s/ Megan E. Gray (Signature of Present Attorney) 7 8 9 10 11 I am duly admitted to practice in this District. Above substitution accepted. DATED: 12/12/13 /s/ Megan A. Bartley (Signature of New Attorney) 12 13 14 15 APPROVED: 16 17 18 December 13, 2013 DATED: ___________________ _______________________________ _____________________________ UNITED FOLEY, JR. GEORGESTATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States Magistrate Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?