Federal Trade Commission v. Ideal Financial Solutions, Inc. et al
Filing
160
ORDER Granting 157 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Megan A. Bartley is substituted in place and stead of Megan E. Gray for Federal Trade Commission. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/13/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
R. MICHAEL WALLER
MEGAN A. BARTLEY
Attorneys
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Mailstop M-8102B
Washington, DC 20580
Phone: (202) 326-2902 (Waller)
Phone: (202) 326-3424 (Bartley)
Facsimile: (202) 326-2558
Email: rwaller@ftc.gov, mbartley@ftc.gov
DANIEL G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
District of Nevada
BLAINE T. WELSH
Assistant United States Attorney
Nevada Bar No. 4790
333 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 5000
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Phone: (702) 388-6336
Facsimile: (702) 388-6787
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Federal Trade Commission
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
15
16
17
Federal Trade Commission,
Case No.: 2:13-CV-00143-JAD-GWF
Plaintiff,
18
v.
19
20
21
22
Ideal Financial Solutions, Inc., et al.
.
Defendants.
SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY
23
Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission hereby substitutes Megan A. Bartley, 600
24
25
26
Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Mailstop M-8102 B, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3424, as
attorney of record in place and stead of Megan E. Gray.
27
28
1
1
2
DATED: 12/12/13
/s/ R. Michael Waller
(Counsel for Plaintiff )
3
4
5
6
I consent to the above substitution.
DATED: 12/12/13
/s/ Megan E. Gray
(Signature of Present Attorney)
7
8
9
10
11
I am duly admitted to practice in this District.
Above substitution accepted.
DATED: 12/12/13
/s/ Megan A. Bartley
(Signature of New Attorney)
12
13
14
15
APPROVED:
16
17
18
December 13, 2013
DATED: ___________________
_______________________________
_____________________________
UNITED FOLEY, JR.
GEORGESTATES DISTRICT JUDGE
United States Magistrate Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?