Karimova v. Alessi & Koenig, LLC et al

Filing 19

ORDER that Plaintiff shall initiate a Rule 26(f) conference within seven (7) days of this order and the parties shall submit a proposed stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order by January 30, 2014. Failure to comply with the requirements of this order may result in sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/15/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
ZULFIYA S. KARIMOVA,
10
11
12
13
14
15

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BERNINI DRIVE TRUST, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:13-cv-00151-JAD-CWH
MINUTE ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ failure to file a proposed stipulated discovery

16

plan and scheduling order. The Complaint (#1) in this matter was filed on January 29, 2013. The

17

first defendant answered or otherwise appeared on February 21, 2013. Pursuant to Local Rule

18

(“LR”) 26-1(d), Plaintiff is required to initiate the scheduling of a conference pursuant to Federal

19

Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) within 30 days after the first defendant answered or otherwise

20

appears. Within fourteen (14) days of the Rule 26(f) conference, the parties are required to submit

21

a stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order. LR 26-1(d). To date, the parties have failed to

22

comply with LR 26-1(d).

23

Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing therefore,

24

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall initiate a Rule 26(f) conference within

25

seven (7) days of this order and the parties shall submit a proposed stipulated discovery plan and

26

scheduling order by January 30, 2014. The proposed plan shall be in compliance with the

27

provisions of LR 26-1 and LR 26-4 of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District

28

Court for the District of Nevada.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that failure to comply with the requirements of this order

1

may result in sanctions, up to and including a recommendation that the case be dismissed, pursuant

2

to, inter alia, LR IA 4-1, Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f), Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(f), or the Court’s inherent

3

authority.

4

DATED: January 15, 2014.

5
6

______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2