Unite Here Health v. Aaron & Paternoster, Ltd. et al
Filing
16
ORDER Denying without prejudice 15 Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order due by 8/2/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/30/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
UNITE HERE HEALTH,
10
11
12
13
14
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
AARON & PATERNOSTER, LTD., et al.,
)
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:13-cv-0154-JCM-NJK
ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY PLAN
(Docket No. 15)
15
16
17
Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed discovery plan and scheduling order (Docket
No. 15), which is hereby DENIED without prejudice.
18
The Rule 26(f) conference was required to be held within 30 days of February 15, 2013, when
19
the first Defendant answered, and the stipulated discovery plan was due 14 days thereafter on April 1,
20
2013. See Local Rule 26-1(d). The Discovery Plan was filed on July 29, 2013, and therefore, is
21
approximately 4 months late. Under Local Rule 26-4, the parties must show excusable neglect for their
22
delay in filing the Proposed Discovery Plan with the Court. LR 26-4.
23
Although the Court is inclined to approve the deadlines set out in the parties’ proposed
24
discovery plan, the parties must comply with the Local Rules and must provide sufficient reasons for
25
their delayed filing. Additionally, in the future, the Court expects counsel to comply with the deadlines
26
set out in Local Rule 26-1(d) unless a stay of discovery or deadline extension is approved by the Court.
27
...
28
...
1
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall submit a revised discovery plan by August 2,
2013.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
DATED: July 30, 2013
5
6
7
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?