Putzer v. Attal., et al.,
Filing
77
ORDER granting 66 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/10/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
DAVID SAUL PUTZER,
8
9
10
11
12
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SHMUEL ATTAL, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:13-cv-00165-APG-CWH
ORDER
13
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Susan Brager, Larry Brown, Tom Collins, Chris
14
Giunchigliani, Mary Beth Scow, Steve Sisolak, and Lawrence Weekly’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees
15
(doc. # 66), filed October 7, 2014. No opposition was filed by Plaintiff.
16
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), “[t]he failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities
17
in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion.” Accordingly, this
18
Court grants Defendants’ motion.
19
20
21
Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
Defendants’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees (doc. # 66) is granted.
DATED: November 10, 2014
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?