Starks v Barber, et al

Filing 21

ORDER Adopting and Approving 19 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's Second and Third Motion/Application to Proceed in forma pauperis 3 and 4 are DENIED. Plaintiff is required to pay the filing fees of $350.00 within 30 days from the date of entry of this Order. Failure to comply with this deadline will result in the Court dismissing this action. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/13/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 *** 8 RENA E. STARKS, 9 Plaintiff, 10 11 Case No. 2:13-cv-00188 -APG-CWH v. Order Approving Findings and Recommendation BERT BARBER, et al, 12 Defendants. 13 14 On March 25, 2013, Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman entered his Order and 15 Findings and Recommendation [Dkt #19]. Judge Hoffman recommended that Plaintiff’s 16 Second and Third Motion/Application to Proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. ## 3 & 4) be 17 denied. Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2, any objection to the Magistrate Judge’s findings 18 and recommendations must be filed within 14 days from the date of service. 19 objection to the March 25, 2013 Findings and Recommendation has been filed. 20 Accordingly, No 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 22 Recommendation dated March 25, 2013 are adopted and approved, and Plaintiff’s 23 Second and Third Motion/Application to Proceed in forma pauperis [Dkt #s 3 & 4) are 24 hereby DENIED. Plaintiff is required to pay the filing fees of $350.00 within 30 days from 25 //// 26 //// 27 28 1 the date of entry of this Order. Failure to comply with this deadline will result in the Court 2 dismissing this action. 3 Dated: May 13, 2013 4 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?