Wilson v. Walmart et al
Filing
7
ORDER Affirming 5 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Bellevue Ice Cream Plant and Defendant Safeway Inc. are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 11/06/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
DAVID LAWRENCE WILSON,
5
Plaintiff,
6
v.
7
WALMART, et al.
8
Defendants.
9
10
***
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:13-CV-00207-PMP-PAL
ORDER
Before the Court for consideration is the Report of Findings and
11
Recommendation (Doc. #5) of the Honorable Peggy A. Leen, United States Magistrate
12
Judge, entered on October 17, 2013. In her Report of Findings and Recommendation,
13
Magistrate Judge Leen recommends that Plaintiff David Lawrence Wilson’s claims against
14
Defendants Safeway, Inc. and Bellevue Ice Cream Plant be dismissed for failure to state a
15
claim upon which relief can be granted. None of the parties filed an objection to the Report
16
of Findings and Recommendation.
17
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in
18
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 1-4 and determines that
19
Magistrate Judge Leen’s Report of Findings and Recommendation should be affirmed.
20
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Leen’s Report of Findings
21
and Recommendation (Doc. #5) is AFFIRMED and that Plaintiff David Lawrence Wilson’s
22
claims against Defendant Safeway, Inc. and Defendant Bellevue Ice Cream Plant are
23
dismissed.
24
DATED: November 6, 2013
25
26
_______________________________
PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?