Bogroff v. Colvin
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 20 Stipulation to Reopen. Carolyn W. Colvin answer due within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/4/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
Case 2:13-cv-00267-JCM-NJK Document 20 Filed 11/03/15 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DANIEL G. BOGDEN
Nevada State Bar No. 2137
United States Attorney
District of Nevada
SHARON LAHEY
California State Bar No. 256628
Assistant Regional Counsel
United States Social Security Administration
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105-1545
Telephone: (415) 977-8963
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: slahey@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
LAS VEGAS DIVISION
13
14
TAMMY R. BOGROFF,
15
Plaintiff,
16
v.
17
18
19
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
) Case No. 2:13-cv-00267-JCM-NJK
)
) STIPULATION TO REOPEN
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
20
21
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and
22
with the approval of the Court, that the above-captioned action be reopened. On February 5,
23
2014, the Court remanded the above-captioned action for further administrative proceedings and
24
retained jurisdiction under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties stipulated to remand
25
because the administrative law judge relied on evidence that did not pertain to Tammy R.
26
Bogroff (“Plaintiff”) in rendering his decision. The proceedings on remand have culminated into
27
the administrative law judge’s unfavorable decision dated June 12, 2015. This decision
28
became the final decision of Carolyn W. Colvin (“Defendant”) on August 11, 2015.
STIPULATION TO REOPEN
CASE NO. 2:13-cv-00267-JCM-NJK
Case 2:13-cv-00267-JCM-NJK Document 20 Filed 11/03/15 Page 2 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Now that the administrative proceedings have concluded, reopening is necessary. In a
sentence-six remand case, the Court retains jurisdiction following the remand. See Melkonyan v.
Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 98; 111 S. Ct. 2157; 115 L. Ed. 78 (1991) (District Court retains
jurisdiction over Social Security cases remanded under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence six, and
where the final administrative decision is favorable to one party or the other, the Commissioner
is to return to Court following completion of the administrative proceedings on remand so that
the Court may enter a final judgment or, as in this case, a dismissal); see also Shalala v. Schaefer,
509 U.S. 292, 298–300 (1993).
It is therefore appropriate to reopen the above-captioned action. Upon reopening,
Defendant will file her answer and certified administrative record within 30 days of the Court’s
order reopening the above-captioned matter.
.
Date: November 3, 2015
ROHLFING & KALAGIAN, LLP
/s/ Marc V. Kalagian
MARC. V. KALAGIAN
14
15
16
Date: November 3, 2015
17
DANIEL G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
/s/ Sharon Lahey
SHARON LAHEY
Special Assistant United States Attorney
18
19
20
21
ORDER
22
23
24
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
November 4, 2015
Dated:_____________
25
26
_________________________________
HON. NANCY J. KOPPE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
STIPULATION TO REOPEN
2
CASE NO. 2:13-cv-00267-JCM-NJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?