West v. Nye County Detention et al
Filing
52
ORDER that Magistrate Judge Ferenbach's Order is affirmed in its entirety, and plaintiff's Objection 47 is overruled. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/29/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
HYRUM JOSEPH WEST,
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
Case No. 2:13-cv-00271-APG-VCF
ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S ORDER
v.
NYE COUNTY et al.,
8
(Dkt. #47)
Defendants.
9
Plaintiff Hyrum Joseph West filed two discovery-related motions in this case. (Dkt. ##33,
10
36.) Magistrate Judge Ferenbach denied those motions because they were untimely.1 (Dkt. #43.)
11
West objected to Judge Ferenbach’s ruling. (Dkt. #47.) I have reviewed the Objection, Judge
12
Ferenbach’s Order, and the underlying papers. Judge Ferenbach’s Order is not “clearly erroneous
13
or contrary to law.” Local Rule IB 3-1(a); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); U.S. ex rel. Carter v.
14
Halliburton, 266 F.R.D. 130, 132 (E.D. Va. 2010) (“[D]iscovery motions do not dispose of the
15
case before the court and are thus nondispositive within the meaning of Rule 72(a).”). Therefore,
16
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Ferenbach’s Order is affirmed in its
17
entirety, and plaintiff’s Objection (Dkt. #47) is overruled.
18
19
DATED this 29th day of June, 2015.
20
21
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Both of plaintiff’s motions were filed after the discovery cut-off date.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?