Stirling Mortimer Global Property Fund PCC Limited v. Roberts et al
Filing
46
ORDER that parties file briefs by 4/4/13 discussing whether 40 Letter should remain sealed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/21/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
STIRLING MORTIMER GLOBAL
PROPERTY FUND PCC LIMITED,
10
11
Plaintiffs,
12
vs.
13
RICHARD NEILL TREVOR ROBERTS,
JANE SHERIDAN ROBERT, and
REGAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS, INC.,
14
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:13-cv-00301-GMN-NJK
ORDER
This matter came before the Court on non-party JPMorgan Chase Bank’s Sealed Letter
[40].
Pursuant to LR 10-5(a), “[u]nless otherwise permitted by statute, rule or prior Court
20
order, papers filed with the Court under seal shall be accompanied by a motion for leave to file
21
those documents under seal, and shall be filed in accordance with the Court’s electronic filing
22
procedures.” The Sealed Letter is not accompanied by a motion to seal nor has JPMorgan
23
provided any other indication as to why the letter has been filed under seal.
24
25
26
27
28
There is a presumption of public access to judicial files and records. Kamakana v. City
and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006). Parties seeking to maintain the
confidentiality of documents attached to nondispositive motions must show good cause exists to
overcome the presumption of public access. Id. To demonstrate good cause, “the party seeking
protection bears the burden of showing specific prejudice or harm will result if no protective
1
order is granted.” Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11
2
(9th Cir.2002).
3
“The Court may direct the unsealing of papers filed under seal, with or without
4
redactions, within the Court’s discretion, after notice to all parties and an opportunity for them to
5
be heard.” LR 10-5(c). Accordingly, the Court directs the parties to provide briefing concerning
6
whether JPMorgan Chase Bank’s Sealed Letter (#40) should remain sealed.
7
Based on the foregoing, and good cause appearing therefore,
8
9
10
11
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties file briefs discussing whether the Sealed
Letter (#40) should remain sealed by April 4, 2012.
2013.
DATED this
21st
day of March, 2013
12
13
14
15
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?