Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Big Town Mechanical, LLC et al

Filing 279

ORDER Granting 278 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Allow Deposition after Discovery Cut-Off (First Request). Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 TEL: (702) 362-7800 / FAX: (702) 362-9472 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 10 11 12 13 KURT C. FAUX, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 003407 WILLI H. SIEPMANN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 002478 THE FAUX LAW GROUP 1540 W. Warm Springs Road, #100 Henderson, Nevada 89014 Telephone: (702) 458-5790 Facsimile: (702) 458-5794 E-Mail: kfaux@fauxlaw.com wsiepmann@fauxlaw.com ALAN J. LEFEBVRE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 000848 WILLIAM D. SCHULLER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 011271 COLBY L. BALKENBUSH, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 013066 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 400 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 362-7800 Facsimile: (702) 362-9472 E-Mail: alefebvre@klnevada.com wschuller@klnevada.com cbalkenbush@klnevada.com 14 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff, FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 19 FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a Maryland corporation, CASE NO.: 2:13-cv-00380-JAD-GWF 20 Plaintiff, 21 vs. 22 23 24 25 BIG TOWN MECHANICAL, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation; DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I-X; inclusive, Defendants. 26 27 28 2715214 (10001-1) Page 1 of 4 STIPULATION TO ALLOW THE DEPOSITION OF DAVID WATKINS TO OCCUR AFTER THE SEPTEMBER 7, 2017 DISCOVERY CUT-OFF 1 2 TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation, 3 Counterclaimant, 4 5 vs. 6 FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a Maryland corporation, and MOES I-X, inclusive, 7 Counter-Defendants. 8 400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 TEL: (702) 362-7800 / FAX: (702) 362-9472 FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a Maryland corporation, 10 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 9 Third-Party Plaintiff, 11 12 13 vs. CONTROLCO, a California corporation; DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATION I-X, inclusive, 14 Third-Party Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland (“F&D”), Defendant Travelers 17 Casualty and Surety Company of America (“Travelers”), and Third-Party Defendant Controlco 18 (“Controlco”) (collectively, “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and 19 agree to allow the deposition of David Watkins to take place on September 22, 2017, which is 20 after the September 7, 2017 discovery deadline. 21 Background 22 23 1. discovery deadline is September 7, 2017. 24 25 Pursuant to this Court’s most recent scheduling order [ECF No. 192]1, the 2. The Parties have worked diligently to complete all depositions by September 7, 2017, including taking multiple depositions on the same day and on weekends. 26 27 1 28 The Court did modify some of the deadlines in [ECF No. 192] in a July 5, 2017 Minute Order [ECF No. 248]. However, none the modified deadlines set forth in [ECF No. 248] are affected by this stipulation. 2715214 (10001-1) Page 2 of 4 1 3. The final deposition in this matter will be the deposition of David Watkins, which 2 was initially set for September 7, 2017 in St. Louis, Missouri.2 Mr. Watkins was the project 3 manager for Perini Management Services, Inc. (“Perini”) which was F&D’s completion 4 contractor on the five FAST Projects that are the subject of this litigation and is thus a key 5 percipient witness. 6 4. Due to family medical issues, F&D’s Counsel and Travelers’ Counsel are unable 7 to travel to St. Louis for Mr. Watkin’s deposition on September 7, 2017. Further due to Mr. 8 Watkin’s schedule, the next available date for him to be deposed that is convenient for all Parties 9 is September 22, 2017. The deposition on September 22, 2017 would take place in Las Vegas 400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 TEL: (702) 362-7800 / FAX: (702) 362-9472 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 10 instead of St. Louis. 11 5. In light of the above, good cause exists to allow the deposition of Mr. Watkin’s to 12 go forward on September 22, 2017 in Las Vegas, even though the deposition would take place 13 after the September 7, 2017 discovery deadline. 14 15 6. Granting this stipulation will not delay the resolution of this litigation as the Parties are not requesting an extension of any court ordered deadlines. 16 DATED this 6th day of September, 2017. DATED this 6th day of September, 2017. 17 KOLESAR & LEATHAM CARNEY BADLEY SPELLMAN By /s/ Colby L. Balkenbush, Esq. ALAN J. LEFEBVRE, ESQ. WILLIAM D. SCHULLER, ESQ. COLBY L. BALKENBUSH, ESQ. 400 South Rampart Blvd., Suite 400 Las Vegas, NV 89145 By /s/ Christopher A. Wright, Esq. CHRISTOPHER A. WRIGHT, ESQ. pro hac vice 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3600 Seattle, WA 98104 18 19 20 21 22 Attorneys for Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland 23 Attorneys for Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America 24 25 26 27 28 2 This stipulation is without prejudice to F&D’s Motion to Re-Open Limited Discovery [ECF No. 276]. 2715214 (10001-1) Page 3 of 4 1 DATED this 6th day of September, 2017. 2 LIPSON, NEILSON, COLE, SELTZER & GARIN, P.C. 3 4 5 6 7 8 By /s/ David A, Markman, Esq, J. WILLIAM EBERT, ESQ. DAVID A. MARKMAN, ESQ. 9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 120 Las Vegas, NV 89144 Attorneys for Controlco 9 400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 TEL: (702) 362-7800 / FAX: (702) 362-9472 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 10 11 ORDER 12 Pursuant to the above Stipulation of the Parties, the Court hereby ORDERS that David 13 Watkins may be deposed on September 22, 2017 in Las Vegas, Nevada even though the 14 deposition will take place after the September 7, 2017 discovery deadline. 15 7th IT IS SO ORDERED this ____ day of September, 2017. 16 17 _______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2715214 (10001-1) Page 4 of 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?