Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Big Town Mechanical, LLC et al
Filing
279
ORDER Granting 278 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Allow Deposition after Discovery Cut-Off (First Request). Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
TEL: (702) 362-7800 / FAX: (702) 362-9472
KOLESAR & LEATHAM
10
11
12
13
KURT C. FAUX, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 003407
WILLI H. SIEPMANN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 002478
THE FAUX LAW GROUP
1540 W. Warm Springs Road, #100
Henderson, Nevada 89014
Telephone: (702) 458-5790
Facsimile: (702) 458-5794
E-Mail: kfaux@fauxlaw.com
wsiepmann@fauxlaw.com
ALAN J. LEFEBVRE, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 000848
WILLIAM D. SCHULLER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 011271
COLBY L. BALKENBUSH, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 013066
KOLESAR & LEATHAM
400 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: (702) 362-7800
Facsimile: (702) 362-9472
E-Mail: alefebvre@klnevada.com
wschuller@klnevada.com
cbalkenbush@klnevada.com
14
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF
MARYLAND
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
19
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF
MARYLAND, a Maryland corporation,
CASE NO.: 2:13-cv-00380-JAD-GWF
20
Plaintiff,
21
vs.
22
23
24
25
BIG TOWN MECHANICAL, LLC, a Nevada
limited liability company; TRAVELERS
CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF
AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation; DOES I
through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I-X;
inclusive,
Defendants.
26
27
28
2715214 (10001-1)
Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION TO ALLOW THE
DEPOSITION OF DAVID WATKINS
TO OCCUR AFTER THE
SEPTEMBER 7, 2017 DISCOVERY
CUT-OFF
1
2
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY
COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut
corporation,
3
Counterclaimant,
4
5
vs.
6
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF
MARYLAND, a Maryland corporation, and
MOES I-X, inclusive,
7
Counter-Defendants.
8
400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
TEL: (702) 362-7800 / FAX: (702) 362-9472
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF
MARYLAND, a Maryland corporation,
10
KOLESAR & LEATHAM
9
Third-Party Plaintiff,
11
12
13
vs.
CONTROLCO, a California corporation; DOES
I through X; and ROE CORPORATION I-X,
inclusive,
14
Third-Party Defendant.
15
16
Plaintiff Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland (“F&D”), Defendant Travelers
17
Casualty and Surety Company of America (“Travelers”), and Third-Party Defendant Controlco
18
(“Controlco”) (collectively, “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and
19
agree to allow the deposition of David Watkins to take place on September 22, 2017, which is
20
after the September 7, 2017 discovery deadline.
21
Background
22
23
1.
discovery deadline is September 7, 2017.
24
25
Pursuant to this Court’s most recent scheduling order [ECF No. 192]1, the
2.
The Parties have worked diligently to complete all depositions by September 7,
2017, including taking multiple depositions on the same day and on weekends.
26
27
1
28
The Court did modify some of the deadlines in [ECF No. 192] in a July 5, 2017 Minute Order [ECF No. 248].
However, none the modified deadlines set forth in [ECF No. 248] are affected by this stipulation.
2715214 (10001-1)
Page 2 of 4
1
3.
The final deposition in this matter will be the deposition of David Watkins, which
2
was initially set for September 7, 2017 in St. Louis, Missouri.2 Mr. Watkins was the project
3
manager for Perini Management Services, Inc. (“Perini”) which was F&D’s completion
4
contractor on the five FAST Projects that are the subject of this litigation and is thus a key
5
percipient witness.
6
4.
Due to family medical issues, F&D’s Counsel and Travelers’ Counsel are unable
7
to travel to St. Louis for Mr. Watkin’s deposition on September 7, 2017. Further due to Mr.
8
Watkin’s schedule, the next available date for him to be deposed that is convenient for all Parties
9
is September 22, 2017. The deposition on September 22, 2017 would take place in Las Vegas
400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
TEL: (702) 362-7800 / FAX: (702) 362-9472
KOLESAR & LEATHAM
10
instead of St. Louis.
11
5.
In light of the above, good cause exists to allow the deposition of Mr. Watkin’s to
12
go forward on September 22, 2017 in Las Vegas, even though the deposition would take place
13
after the September 7, 2017 discovery deadline.
14
15
6.
Granting this stipulation will not delay the resolution of this litigation as the
Parties are not requesting an extension of any court ordered deadlines.
16
DATED this 6th day of September, 2017.
DATED this 6th day of September, 2017.
17
KOLESAR & LEATHAM
CARNEY BADLEY SPELLMAN
By /s/ Colby L. Balkenbush, Esq.
ALAN J. LEFEBVRE, ESQ.
WILLIAM D. SCHULLER, ESQ.
COLBY L. BALKENBUSH, ESQ.
400 South Rampart Blvd., Suite 400
Las Vegas, NV 89145
By /s/ Christopher A. Wright, Esq.
CHRISTOPHER A. WRIGHT, ESQ. pro hac vice
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3600
Seattle, WA 98104
18
19
20
21
22
Attorneys for Fidelity & Deposit
Company of Maryland
23
Attorneys for Travelers Casualty and Surety
Company of America
24
25
26
27
28
2
This stipulation is without prejudice to F&D’s Motion to Re-Open Limited Discovery [ECF No. 276].
2715214 (10001-1)
Page 3 of 4
1
DATED this 6th day of September, 2017.
2
LIPSON, NEILSON, COLE, SELTZER
& GARIN, P.C.
3
4
5
6
7
8
By /s/ David A, Markman, Esq,
J. WILLIAM EBERT, ESQ.
DAVID A. MARKMAN, ESQ.
9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 120
Las Vegas, NV 89144
Attorneys for Controlco
9
400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
TEL: (702) 362-7800 / FAX: (702) 362-9472
KOLESAR & LEATHAM
10
11
ORDER
12
Pursuant to the above Stipulation of the Parties, the Court hereby ORDERS that David
13
Watkins may be deposed on September 22, 2017 in Las Vegas, Nevada even though the
14
deposition will take place after the September 7, 2017 discovery deadline.
15
7th
IT IS SO ORDERED this ____ day of September, 2017.
16
17
_______________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2715214 (10001-1)
Page 4 of 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?