Calvert v. Ellis et al

Filing 155

ORDER that Magistrate Judge Koppe's 144 Order is Affirmed in its entirety and Plaintiff's 147 Objection is Overruled. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/13/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 LAUREN CALVERT, individually, 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Case No. 2:13-cv-00464-APG-NJK Plaintiff, v. DARLENE ELLIS AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO MICHAEL WAYNE ELLIS; EXPRESS DAILY; DAILY EXPRESS, INC.; DOE OWNER, I-V, DOE DRIVER, I-V, ROE EMPLOYER, AND ROE COMPANIES, inclusive, ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER TO EXCLUDE ALL EVIDENCE REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S FUTURE SURGERIES (Dkt. ##144, 147) Defendants. 12 Defendants filed a motion in limine to exclude evidence about plaintiff Lauren Calvert’s 13 future surgeries. (Dkt. #76.) Magistrate Judge Koppe granted that motion. (Dkt. #144.) Calvert 14 then filed an objection to Judge Koppe’s order. (Dkt. #147.) 15 I have reviewed the objection, Judge Koppe’s order, and the underlying papers. Judge 16 Koppe’s order is not “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Local Rule IB 3-1(a). Therefore, 17 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Koppe’s order (Dkt. #144) is affirmed in its entirety, and plaintiff’s objection (Dkt. #147) is overruled. 19 20 DATED this 13th day of April, 2015. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?