Branch Banking And Trust Company v. Iny et al
Filing
70
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 68 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/24/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
*****
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST
COMPANY, a North Carolina banking
corporation,
)
) Case no. 2:13-cv-00469-LRH-(PAL)
)
) ORDER
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
YOEL INY; NOAM SCHWARTZ; YOEL
)
INY, Trustee of the Y&T INY FAMILY
)
TRUST dated June 8, 1994, as amended;
)
NOAM SCHWARTZ, Trustee of the NOAM )
SCHWARTZ TRUST dated August 19, 1999; )
D.M.S.I., LLC, a Nevada limited liability
)
company; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, )
)
Defendant.
)
)
18
19
Before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of action Without
20
Prejudice (#691) in which Plaintiff requests dismissal of this case without prejudice pursuant to
21
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), because the plaintiff has entered into a
22
settlement and release agreement (“Agreement”) with White Beauty Development, LLC whereby
23
the parties to the Agreement provide that this action will be dismissed without prejudice. If
24
White Beauty Development, LLC performs pursuant to the Agreement, the loan will be paid and
25
there will be no action brought against the Defendants, the original guarantors of the loan.
26
However, if White Beauty Development, LLC does not perform pursuant to the Agreement,
27
Plaintiff reserves its right to bring a new action against the Defendants. No opposition to the
28
motion has been filed.
1
Refers to the court’s docketing number.
1
Good cause appearing,
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
DATED this 24th day of June, 2015.
_______________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?