Cummings v. United Healthcare Services, Inc. et al

Filing 50

ORDER re 49 Status Report. The rebuttal expert deadline is extended to 5/9/2014 with all other discovery deadlines to remain the same pursuant to the Court's 40 Order. Discovery will close 5/19/2014. Defendant agrees that Plaintiff will have until 6/8/2014 to depose Defendant's rebuttal expert, if one is retained in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/21/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:13-cv-00479-APG-GWF Document 49 Filed 04/14/14 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 WENDY MEDURA KRINCEK, ESQ., Bar # 6417 JAMIE CHU, ESQ., Bar # 10546 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 Telephone: 702.862.8800 Fax No.: 702.862.8811 Attorneys for Defendants VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, D/B/A DESERT SPRINGS HOSPITAL; AND RAEJOHNE FOSTER 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 ANGELA CUMMINGS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, a Delaware Limited-Liability Company d/b/a DESERT SPRINGS HOSPITAL; RAEJOHNE FOSTER, an individual, 15 16 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C . ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3960 H oward Hughes Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 702.862.8800 STATUS REPORT PURSUANT TO ORDER (DOC. 46) AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE REBUTTAL EXPERT DEADLINE Defendants. 17 19 CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00479-APG-GWF Plaintiff Angela Cummings (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants Valley Health System, LLC, d/b/a Desert Springs Hospital and RaeJohne Foster (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby file this Status Report to the Court pursuant to its Order (Doc. 46) regarding the Stipulation and Order to Extend the Rebuttal Expert Deadline (Doc. 45). As the Court is aware, Defendants served the subpoena for Plaintiff’s medical records to Southwest Medical Associates on March 17, 2014. Southwest Medical Associates’ response to the subpoena for records was due on or before April 4, 2014. Defendants received Southwest Medical Associates’ subpoena response on April 9, 2014, which consists of 826 pages. The Order provides that upon receipt of a status report regarding the receipt of the medical Case 2:13-cv-00479-APG-GWF Document 49 Filed 04/14/14 Page 2 of 2 1 records the Court would grant a 30 day extension of the deadline to make rebuttal expert disclosures 2 (Doc. 46). Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court grant their Stipulation and 3 Order to amend the current scheduling order and discovery plan (third request) by extending the 4 current rebuttal expert deadline date of March 24, 2014 for 30 days from April 9, 2014, the date 5 Defendants received the subpoena response from Southwest Medical Associates, to May 9, 2014, 6 with all other discovery deadlines to remain the same pursuant to the Court’s Order (Doc. 40) filed 7 on January 14, 2014. As such, discovery in this matter will close on May 19, 2014 (Doc. 40). 8 However, notwithstanding the discovery date, Defendant agrees that Plaintiff will have until June 8, 9 2014 to depose Defendant’s rebuttal expert, if one is retained in this matter. This extension is sought 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. Dated: April 14, 2014 Dated: April 14, 2014 Respectfully submitted, Respectfully submitted, /s/ James P. Kemp, Esq. JAMES P. KEMP, ESQ. KEMP & KEMP, ATTORNEYS AT LAW /s/ Jamie Chu, Esq. WENDY MEDURA KRINCEK, ESQ. JAMIE CHU, ESQ. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants 18 ORDER 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 21st Dated this ______ day of April, 2014 22 23 24 ___________________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C . ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3960 H oward Hughes Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 702.862.8800 Firmwide:126260355.1 069080.1036 2.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?