Chambers v. Nevens et al
Filing
7
ORDER Granting 6 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider. The 4 order and the 5 Judgment dismissing this action is VACATED, and this action is REINSTATED. Payment of filing fee due within 30 days. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/11/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
ANDREW EARL CHAMBERS,
10
11
12
13
Case No. 2:13-cv-00489-MMD-GWF
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
WARDEN NEVENS, et al.,
Respondents.
14
15
The Court dismissed this action because petitioner neither filed an application to
16
proceed in forma pauperis nor paid the filing fee. Petitioner has submitted a motion to
17
reconsider (dkt. no. 6). He first states that he intended to pay the filing fee but that he
18
was waiting for an order from the Court telling him to do that. Petitioner’s excuse is
19
unconvincing. If he truly had intended to pay the filing fee, then he would have paid the
20
filing fee. He needed no order from the Court to do that. Petitioner next states that the
21
date he mailed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus is important for the issue of
22
timeliness. For that reason, and based upon the Court’s preliminary calculations, the
23
Court will grant petitioner relief.
24
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion to reconsider (dkt. no.6)
25
is GRANTED. The order (dkt. no. 4) and the judgment (dkt. no. 5) dismissing this action
26
are VACATED, and this action is REINSTATED.
27
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall make the necessary
28
arrangements to pay the filing fee of five dollars ($5.00), accompanied by a copy of this
1
order. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date that this order is entered to
2
comply. Failure to comply will result in the dismissal of this action.
3
4
DATED THIS 11th day of April 2013.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?