Ferguson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Filing
52
ORDER that 20 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/1/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
2:13-CV-517 JCM (GWF)
JAMES FERGUSON,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al.,
12
13
Defendant(s).
14
ORDER
15
Presently before the court is defendant BRR Architecture Inc.’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. #
16
20). Though the response deadline has passed, plaintiffs James Ferguson and the estate of Roselyn
17
Ferguson have not filed an opposition.
18
After the instant motion was filed, Magistrate Judge Foley filed an order striking the portions
19
of the complaint that pertained to defendant BRR Architecture Inc. (Doc. # 34). As there are no
20
claims pending against BRR Architecture Inc., the motion to dismiss is now moot.
21
Accordingly,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED defendant BRR Architecture
23
Inc.’s motion to dismiss (doc. # 20) be, and at the same time hereby is, DENIED as moot.
24
DATED April 1, 2014.
25
26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?