Ferguson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 52

ORDER that 20 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/1/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11

2:13-CV-517 JCM (GWF)

JAMES FERGUSON,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al.,

12
13

Defendant(s).

14

ORDER

15

Presently before the court is defendant BRR Architecture Inc.’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. #

16

20). Though the response deadline has passed, plaintiffs James Ferguson and the estate of Roselyn

17

Ferguson have not filed an opposition.

18

After the instant motion was filed, Magistrate Judge Foley filed an order striking the portions

19

of the complaint that pertained to defendant BRR Architecture Inc. (Doc. # 34). As there are no

20

claims pending against BRR Architecture Inc., the motion to dismiss is now moot.

21

Accordingly,

22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED defendant BRR Architecture

23

Inc.’s motion to dismiss (doc. # 20) be, and at the same time hereby is, DENIED as moot.

24

DATED April 1, 2014.

25
26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge