Gagnon et al v. State of Nevada et al

Filing 92

ORDER denying 91 Stipulation to extend dates. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/9/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

JEAN GAGNON,

8
9
10

Case No. 2:13-cv-00528-JAD-PAL
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
STATE OF NEVDA, et al.,
Defendants.

11
12

Before the court is the parties’ Stipulation to Extend Dates Set by Discovery Plan and

13

Scheduling Order (Dkt. #91). The request does not comply with LR 26-4 explaining what

14

discovery has been completed, a description of the discovery that remains to be completed, or the

15

reasons why discovery could not be completed within the time set by the discovery plan. The

16

parties state only that a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is fully briefed and future

17

discovery will depend on the outcome of the motion. Judge Dorsey previously granted in part

18

and denied in part an earlier filed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings for Failure to State a

19

Claim/Special Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend, but found Plaintiff could proceed on

20

retaliation and state law conspiracy claims. The current motion for judgment on the pleadings is

21

not case dispositive and all of the Plaintiff’s claims arise out of the same factual background.

22

For these reasons,

23

IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation to Extend Dates (Dkt. #91) is DENIED.

24

DATED this 9th day of April, 2015.

25
26
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1