Hood v. Wyeth LLC et al

Filing 72

ORDER DISMISSING CASE Granting 69 Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/7/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
Case 2:13-cv-00531-JCM-PAL Document 70 Filed 05/03/13 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 GREG W. MARSH, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 322 LAW OFFICES OF GREG W. MARSH 731 South Seventh Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Tel: (702) 387-0052 Fax: (702) 387-0063 Gwm4253@aol.com 5 9 CURTIS J. BUSBY, ESQ. Nevada Bar. No. 6581 BOWMAN AND BROOKE LLP 2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 1600 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Tel: (602) 643-2300 Fax: (602) 248-0947 curtis.busby@bowmanandbrooke.com 10 Attorneys for Alaven Pharmaceutical LLC 6 7 8 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 MARY HOOD, Plaintiff(s), 14 15 v. 16 BRAND NAME DEFENDANTS: WYETH LLC, WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS INC., individually and d/b/a ESI LEDERLE, INC., PFIZER, INC., SCHWARZ PHARMA, INC., n/k/a UCB, INC., SCHWARZ PHARMA AG, UCB GMBH d/b/a SCHWARZ PHARMA AG, ALAVEN PHARMACEUTICAL LLC, BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, WOCKHARDT USA, LLC, and MORTON GROVE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 GENERIC DEFENDANTS: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., individually and d/b/a IVAX PHARMACEUTICALS, MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC., and JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS. Defendants. 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:13-cv-00531-JCM-PAL ORDER Case 2:13-cv-00531-JCM-PAL Document 70 Filed 05/03/13 Page 2 of 2 1 Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. No. 69), Plaintiff's 2 claims and causes of action against all defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice 3 pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 __________________________ James C. Mahan UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 Dated: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 May 7, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?