Hood v. Wyeth LLC et al
Filing
72
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Granting 69 Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/7/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
Case 2:13-cv-00531-JCM-PAL Document 70 Filed 05/03/13 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
GREG W. MARSH, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 322
LAW OFFICES OF GREG W. MARSH
731 South Seventh Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Tel: (702) 387-0052
Fax: (702) 387-0063
Gwm4253@aol.com
5
9
CURTIS J. BUSBY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar. No. 6581
BOWMAN AND BROOKE LLP
2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 1600
Phoenix, Arizona 85012
Tel: (602) 643-2300
Fax: (602) 248-0947
curtis.busby@bowmanandbrooke.com
10
Attorneys for Alaven Pharmaceutical LLC
6
7
8
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
13
MARY HOOD,
Plaintiff(s),
14
15
v.
16
BRAND NAME DEFENDANTS:
WYETH LLC, WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS
INC., individually and d/b/a ESI LEDERLE, INC.,
PFIZER, INC., SCHWARZ PHARMA, INC., n/k/a
UCB, INC., SCHWARZ PHARMA AG, UCB
GMBH d/b/a SCHWARZ PHARMA AG, ALAVEN
PHARMACEUTICAL LLC, BAXTER
HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, WOCKHARDT
USA, LLC, and MORTON GROVE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
GENERIC DEFENDANTS:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,
individually and d/b/a IVAX
PHARMACEUTICALS, MUTUAL
PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC., and
JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS.
Defendants.
25
26
///
27
///
28
///
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:13-cv-00531-JCM-PAL
ORDER
Case 2:13-cv-00531-JCM-PAL Document 70 Filed 05/03/13 Page 2 of 2
1
Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. No. 69), Plaintiff's
2
claims and causes of action against all defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice
3
pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
__________________________
James C. Mahan
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
Dated:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
May 7, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?