Taddeo v. Colvin
Filing
33
ORDER Adopting 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. FURTHER ORDERED that 23 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand is DENIED; and Defendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm (contained within 28 Response) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/3/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
Frank Taddeo,
5
6
7
Case No.: 2:13-cv-541-JAD-CWH
Plaintiff
Order Adopting Findings and
Recommendation [Doc. 32],
Denying Motion to Remand
[Doc. 23], and Granting Cross Motion
to Affirm [Doc. 28]
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin,
8
Defendant
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Magistrate Judge Carl Hoffman entered proposed findings and a recommended disposition of
the above captioned matter on September 15, 2014, recommending that plaintiff Frank Taddeo’s
motion to remand [Doc. 23] be denied and defendant’s cross motion to affirm [Doc. 28] be granted.
Doc. 32.1 Objections were due October 2, 2014. Taddeo has filed no objection. “[N]o review is
required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”2
Accordingly, and with good cause appearing,
It is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Hoffman’s report and recommendation [Doc.
32] is ADOPTED.
It is further ORDERED that Frank Taddeo’s motion to remand [Doc. 23] is DENIED.
It is further ORDERED that Carolyn Colvin’s cross motion to affirm [Doc. 28] is
GRANTED.
DATED October 3, 2014.
22
_________________________________
JENNIFER A. DORSEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
1
Colvin’s cross motion to affirm, and her response to Taddeo’s motion to remand, are the same
document.
2
28
Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003). See also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S.
140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?