Roadhouse et al v. Patenaude & Felix, APC

Filing 52

ORDER Granting 51 Stipulation to Continue Deadline for Submitting Proposed Pre-Trial Order. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/13/2015. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/6/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

1

3

CRAIG B. FRIEDBERG, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 004606
4760 South Pecos Road, Suite 103
Las Vegas, Nevada 89121
Phone: [phone]; Fax: [phone]

4

Attorney for Plaintiff

2

5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8
9

TRINA ROADHOUSE, SCOTT
ROADHOUSE,
Plaintiffs,

4760 SOUTH PECOS ROAD, SUITE 103
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89121
[phone] Telecopier [phone]

Law Offices of

CRAIG B. FRIEDBERG, ESQ.

10

vs.

11

CASE NO.:

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTING
PROPOSED PRE-TRIAL ORDER

PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C. a foreign
corporation, DOES I-V inclusive, and ROE
Corporations VI-X, inclusive,

12
13
14

2:13-cv-0560-GMN-CWH

[Second Request]

Defendants.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Plaintiffs, TRINA AND SCOTT

15

ROADHOUSE, though their attorney of record, Craig B. Friedberg, Esq. of the LAW

16

OFFICES OF CRAIG B. FRIEDBERG, ESQ. and Defendant, PATENAUDE & FELIX,

17

A.P.C. by and through its counsel of record, MARTIN J. KRAVITZ, ESQ. and GINA M.

18

MUSHMECHE, ESQ., of the law firm of KRAVITZ, SCHNITZER & JOHNSON, CHTD.,

19

that the parties have stipulated to continue the deadline for the Proposed Joint Pre-Trial

20

Order for the following reasons:

21

1.

The parties began preparation of the proposed joint pre-trial order

22

(hereinafter ?proposed PTO”) last week after the court-ordered settlement conference

23

was unsuccessful in resolving this matter. Plaintiffs’ attorney experienced some

24

problems with his computer and was unable to complete or send what was drafted to

25

Defendant’s attorney until the afternoon of July 6, 2015.

26
27
28

2.

Defendant’s counsel is unable to fully review, meet and confer with

Plaintiffs’ counsel, and revise the draft of the proposed PTO before tonight’s deadline.
3.

Rather than submitting separate proposed PTO from each party, the

1

parties respectfully request a continuation of the deadline, currently set at July 6, 2015,

2

for one week, or until July 13, 2015, so that a single, joint proposed PTO can be

3

submitted for the Court’s consideration.

4

DATED this 6th day of July 2015.

DATED this 6th day of July 2015

Law Offices of Craig B. Friedberg, Esq.

Kravitz, Schnitzer & Johnson

8

/s/ Craig Friedberg
CRAIG B. FRIEDBERG, ESQ.
4760 South Pecos Road, Suite 103
Las Vegas, NV 89121

9

Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Gina Mushmeche
GINA M. MUSHMECHE, ESQ.
MARTIN J. KRAVITZ, ESQ.
8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
Attorneys for Defendants

5
6
7

4760 SOUTH PECOS ROAD, SUITE 103
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89121
[phone] Telecopier [phone]

Law Offices of

CRAIG B. FRIEDBERG, ESQ.

10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13
14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.
_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
DATED:_________________________
United States District Court

17
18

DATED: 07/06/2015.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-