Grand Canyon Skywalk Development, LLC et al v. Steele et al

Filing 106

ORDER that 103 Motion to File 104 Reply Under Seal is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/17/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Case 2:13-cv-00596-JAD-GWF Document 103 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 4

1 Mark Tratos (NV Bar No. 1086)
Donald L. Prunty (NV Bar No. 8230)
2 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
3773 Howard Hughes Parkway
3 Ste. 400 North
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
4 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
5 Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11
12
13
14

GRAND CANYON SKYWALK
DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Nevada limited
liability company; DY TRUST DATED
JUNE 3, 2013, a Nevada Trust;
THEODORE (TED) R. QUASULA, an
individual;

No. 2:13-cv-00596-RCJ-GWF

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL ITS REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE
SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs,

15
16

vs.

17

DAVID JOHN CIESLAK, an individual;
NICHOLAS PETER “CHIP” SCUTARI, an
individual; SCUTARI & CIESLAK
PUBLIC RELATIONS, INC., an Arizona
corporation.

18
19
20

Defendants.

21
22
23

Comes now Plaintiffs Grand Canyon Skywalk Development, LLC, DY Trust dated June 3,

24 2013 and Theodore (Ted) R. Quasula (collectively “Plaintiffs”), by and through their attorneys,
25 Greenberg Traurig, LLP, and hereby file this motion to file under seal Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’
26 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint and supporting exhibits.
27

A stipulated protective order has been entered in this matter [doc. no. 74]. Pursuant to the

28 terms of the protective order, information disclosed in documents produced by a party deemed
LV 420418328v1

1

Case 2:13-cv-00596-JAD-GWF Document 103 Filed 03/16/15 Page 2 of 4

1 confidential shall be governed by the protective order and marked with an appropriate legend of
2 “Confidential” or “Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”
3

Plaintiffs are filing a reply in support of its motion for leave to file supplemental complaint,

4 under seal, which memorandum of points and authorities contains information designated as
5 Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only within documents produced by Defendants. Additionally, Exhibits
6 B, C and E to the Reply contains confidential information, the entirety of which has been deemed
7 confidential under the proposed protective order. Public disclosure of information contained in the
8 Reply along with the documents attached as exhibits to the Reply would waive the confidential nature
9 of the information.
10

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court grant them leave to file their

11 Reply, including exhibits, to Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file supplemental complaint under seal.
12

Respectfully submitted this 16th day of March, 2015.

13
14

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

15
/s/ Mark G. Tratos
Mark G. Tratos
Donald L. Prunty
3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 400 North
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

16
17
18
19
20
21

ORDER
Having read and considered Plaintiffs’ Motion to File Under Seal Reply in Support of

22 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint and supporting exhibits and for good
23 cause shown,
24

17th
March
It is so ORDERED this ______ day of ____________, 2015 that Plaintiffs’ Motion to File

25 Under Seal Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint and
26 supporting exhibits, be filed under seal.
27

_____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DATED: _____________________________
DATED: March 17, 2015

28
LV 420418328v1

2