Hardy v. Clark County Detention Center
Filing
5
ORDER that this action is Dismissed. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/18/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
ALTON HARDY,
11
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
CLARK COUNTY DETENTION
CENTER,
15
Defendant.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
/
2:13-cv-00605-JCM-PAL
ORDER
17
On May 13, 2013, the court issued an order that granted plaintiff’s application to proceed
18
in forma pauperis and dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to file an amended complaint (ECF
19
#2). On May 22, 2013, that order, served on plaintiff at his address of record, was returned by the U.S.
20
Postal Service as undeliverable. Pursuant to Rule 2-2 of the Local Rules of Special Proceedings and
21
Appeals, a pro se litigant is required to keep the court apprised of his or her current address at all times.
22
Local Rule 2-2 states: “The plaintiff shall immediately file with the court written notification of any
23
change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party or the
24
party’s attorney. Failure to comply with this rule may result in dismissal of the action with prejudice.”
25
Accordingly, as plaintiff has failed to file written notification of change of address with the court, this
26
action is dismissed.
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED.
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close
3
this case.
4
5
July 18, 2013.
DATED this _____ day of ______________________________, 2013.
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?