Weeks-Anderegg v. United States of America, et al
Filing
29
ORDER Denying 28 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Vacate Hearing and Stay Discovery. Counsel must personally appear at Friday's hearing and be prepared to present arguments regarding how this case should proceed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/1/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
***
5
6
FRANCES M. WEEKS-ANDEREGG,
7
Plaintiff,
8
vs.
9
2:13-cv-00610-GMN-VCF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
10
MINUTE ORDER
Defendants.
11
12
13
On September 30, 2013, Robert Cardenas filed Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Vacate Hearing
and Stay Discovery. (#28).
14
Having reviewed this motion and the other motions pending in this matter, I find that vacating
15
the hearing set on Defendant’s Motion to Stay Discovery (#7), presently set for 2:00 p.m. on Friday,
16
October 4, 2013, in Courtroom 3D, is not in the best interests of the parties or the court.
17
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Vacate Hearing and Stay Discovery is DENIED.
18
Counsel must personally appear at Friday’s hearing and be prepared to present arguments
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
regarding how this case should proceed in light of:
1. 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d)(5) which addresses the consequences of dismissal for failure to
first present a claim pursuant to section 2675(a); and
2. Section II B of the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in Osborn v. Haley, 549 U.S. 225,
127 S. Ct. 891, 166 L.ed.2d 819(2007).
DATED this 1st day of October, 2013.
_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?