Weeks-Anderegg v. United States of America, et al

Filing 29

ORDER Denying 28 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Vacate Hearing and Stay Discovery. Counsel must personally appear at Friday's hearing and be prepared to present arguments regarding how this case should proceed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/1/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 *** 5 6 FRANCES M. WEEKS-ANDEREGG, 7 Plaintiff, 8 vs. 9 2:13-cv-00610-GMN-VCF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 10 MINUTE ORDER Defendants. 11 12 13 On September 30, 2013, Robert Cardenas filed Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Vacate Hearing and Stay Discovery. (#28). 14 Having reviewed this motion and the other motions pending in this matter, I find that vacating 15 the hearing set on Defendant’s Motion to Stay Discovery (#7), presently set for 2:00 p.m. on Friday, 16 October 4, 2013, in Courtroom 3D, is not in the best interests of the parties or the court. 17 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Vacate Hearing and Stay Discovery is DENIED. 18 Counsel must personally appear at Friday’s hearing and be prepared to present arguments 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 regarding how this case should proceed in light of: 1. 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d)(5) which addresses the consequences of dismissal for failure to first present a claim pursuant to section 2675(a); and 2. Section II B of the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in Osborn v. Haley, 549 U.S. 225, 127 S. Ct. 891, 166 L.ed.2d 819(2007). DATED this 1st day of October, 2013. _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?