Pradd v. Williams et al
Filing
30
ORDER that 29 Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 22 MOTION to Dismiss and 23 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff's responses are due no later than 30 days from the issuance of this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/16/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12
STEVEN S. PRADD,
#45123
13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al.,
16
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
/
2:13-cv-00611-JCM-NJK
ORDER
17
18
Presently before the court is pro se plaintiff Steven S. Pradd’s motion to extend time to respond
19
to defendants’ motions to dismiss and for summary judgment. (Doc. # 29). Plaintiff previously filed
20
a motion for appointment of counsel (doc. # 27) which the magistrate denied (doc. # 28). In light of that
21
order, plaintiff seeks an additional 30 days in which to file his responses.
22
Upon review of the motion and with good cause appearing, plaintiff’s motion is hereby granted.
23
Accordingly,
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff’s motion to extend time
25
26
(doc. # 29) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.
1
2
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s responses are due no later than 30 days from the
issuance of this order.
DATED January 16, 2014.
4
5
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?