Pradd v. Williams et al

Filing 30

ORDER that 29 Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 22 MOTION to Dismiss and 23 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff's responses are due no later than 30 days from the issuance of this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/16/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12

STEVEN S. PRADD,
#45123

13

Plaintiff,

14

vs.

15

BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al.,

16

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
/

2:13-cv-00611-JCM-NJK
ORDER

17
18

Presently before the court is pro se plaintiff Steven S. Pradd’s motion to extend time to respond

19

to defendants’ motions to dismiss and for summary judgment. (Doc. # 29). Plaintiff previously filed

20

a motion for appointment of counsel (doc. # 27) which the magistrate denied (doc. # 28). In light of that

21

order, plaintiff seeks an additional 30 days in which to file his responses.

22

Upon review of the motion and with good cause appearing, plaintiff’s motion is hereby granted.

23

Accordingly,

24

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff’s motion to extend time

25
26

(doc. # 29) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.

1
2
3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s responses are due no later than 30 days from the
issuance of this order.
DATED January 16, 2014.

4
5

__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

2