Collins v. Social Security Administration
Filing
28
ORDER adopting 27 Report and Recommendation. Denying 16 Motion for Summary Judgment. Granting 24 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/31/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
* * *
4
5
JANET M. COLLINS,
Case No.: 2:13-cv-00613-RFB-CWH
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
ORDER
ACCEPTING
REPORT
&
RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE
JUDGE CARL W. HOFFMAN
v.
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
9
Defendant.
10
11
12
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 27) of
the Honorable Carl W. Hoffman, United States Magistrate Judge, entered September 15, 2014.
13
Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by October 2, 2014. No objections
14
have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with Magistrate
15
Judge’s recommendation(s) that (ECF No. 16) Motion for Summary Judgment be denied and
16
further recommending that (ECF No. 24) Defendant's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment be
17
granted. Therefore, the Court has determined that Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation should
18
be ACCEPTED and ADOPTED to the extent that it is not inconsistent with this opinion.
19
...
20
...
21
...
22
23
24
25
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 27) is
2
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. (ECF No. 16) Motion for Summary Judgment be denied
3
and further recommending that (ECF No. 24) Defendant's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment
4
be granted.
5
The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case.
6
DATED this 31st day of October, 2014.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE II
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?