Moore v. Masto et al
Filing
155
ORDER Granting 154 Motion to Extend Time to Answer 59 Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty. Aaron Ford answer due 6/10/2022; William Gittere answer due 6/10/2022. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner will h ave 120 days to file a reply to Respondents answer; in all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the 2/5/2019, scheduling order (ECF No. 51 ), will remain in effect. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/8/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
RANDOLPH L. MOORE,
8
Petitioner,
9
Case No. 2:13-cv-0655-JCM-DJA
v.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
(ECF NO. 154)
10
11
12
WILLIAM GITTERE, et al.,
Respondents.
13
14
In this capital habeas corpus action, after a 120-day initial period, and extensions
15
of time of 62, 30, 30, 60 and 62 days, the respondents were due to file an answer by
16
April 11, 2022. See Order entered April 12, 2021 (ECF No. 143) (120 days for answer);
17
Order entered August 4, 2021 (ECF No. 145) (62-day extension); Order entered
18
November 1, 2021 (ECF No. 147) (30-day extension); Order entered November 8, 2021
19
(ECF No. 149) (30-day extension); Order entered December 16, 2021 (ECF No. 151)
20
(60-day extension); Order entered March 1, 2022 (ECF No. 153) (62-day extension).
21
On April 6, 2022, Respondents filed a motion for extension of time (ECF
22
No. 154), requesting a further 60-day extension of time, to June 10, 2022. Respondents’
23
counsel states that the extension of time is necessary because of his obligations in
24
other cases and time away from work. Petitioner does not oppose the motion for
25
extension of time.
26
The Court finds that Respondents’ motion for extension of time is made in good
27
faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the
28
requested extension of time.
1
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion for Extension of
2
Time (ECF No. 154) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until and including
3
June 10, 2022, to file their answer.
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner will have 120 days to file a reply to
5
Respondents’ answer; in all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set
6
forth in the February 5, 2019, scheduling order (ECF No. 51), will remain in effect.
7
8
DATED April 8, 2022 of ______________________, 2022.
THIS ___ day
9
10
JAMES C. MAHAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?